Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26654046›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Parent and child perceptions of school-based obesity prevention in England: a qualitative study.

Joanne L Clarke, Tania L Griffin, Emma R Lancashire, Peymane Adab, Jayne M Parry, Miranda J Pallan, WAVES study trial investigators

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How Did Parents View the Impact of the Curriculum-Based HealthLit4Kids Program Beyond the Classroom?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanne L ClarkeInstitute of Applied Health Research, Public Health building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. j.l.clarke@bham.ac.uk.
Tania L GriffinInstitute of Applied Health Research, Public Health building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. t.l.griffin.1@bham.ac.uk.
Emma R LancashireInstitute of Applied Health Research, Public Health building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. e.r.lancashire@bham.ac.uk.
Peymane AdabInstitute of Applied Health Research, Public Health building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. p.adab@bham.ac.uk.
Jayne M ParryInstitute of Applied Health Research, Public Health building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. j.m.parry.1@bham.ac.uk.
Miranda J PallanInstitute of Applied Health Research, Public Health building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. m.j.pallan@bham.ac.uk.
WAVES study trial investigators

Funding

Department of Health 06/85/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchools are key settings for childhood obesity prevention, and the location for many intervention studies. This qualitative study aims to explore parent and child experiences of the WAVES study obesity prevention intervention, in order to gain understanding of the mechanisms by which the intervention results in behaviour change, and provide context to support interpretation of the main trial results.

methodsFocus groups were held with 30 parents and 62 children (aged 6-7 years) from primary schools in the West Midlands, UK. Data analysis (conducted using NVivo 10) was guided by the Framework Approach.

resultsThree over-arching themes were identified: 'Impact', 'Sustainability' and 'Responsibilities', under which sub-themes were determined. Participants were supportive of the school-based intervention. Parental involvement and the influential role of the teacher were seen as key ingredients for success in promoting consistent messages and empowering some parents to make positive behavioural changes at home. Parents recognised that whilst they held the primary responsibility for obesity prevention in their children, they faced a number of barriers to healthier lifestyles, and agreed that schools have an important role to play.

conclusionsThis study enabled us to better understand aspects of the WAVES study intervention programme that have the potential to initiate positive behaviour changes in families, and indicated that a combination of pathways influenced such changes. Pathways included: increasing capability through improving knowledge and skills of children and parents; increasing motivation through parental empowerment and role modelling; and the direct provision of opportunities to lead healthier lifestyles. Strategies to sustain behaviour changes, and the school role in supporting these, are important considerations.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth PromotionParentsSchool Health ServicesSchoolsAdultChildEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLife StyleMaleMotivationParentingPediatric Obesity

Identifiers

PMID26654046
PMCPMC4674916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.