ArticleAccounts of chemical research2016
Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for Guiding Neural Regeneration.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Quercetin-Controlled Delivery to Protect Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Carbon-based nanotechnology for Parkinson's disease: diagnostic and therapeutic innovations.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Advanced Nanoparticle-Engineered Platforms for Peripheral Nerve Repair: Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies and Clinical Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Palladium-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites enhance neurite outgrowth and protect neurons from Ishemic stroke.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Nanotherapeutics for Alleviating Anesthesia-Associated Complications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Novel Approaches to Studying SLC13A5 Disease.Metabolites · 2024Review
- Targeted Delivery of Potent Chemical Drugs and RNAi to Drug-Resistant Breast Cancer Using RNA-Nanotechnology and RNA-Ligand Displaying Extracellular vesicles.RNA nanomed · 2024Article
- Direct Conjugation of Retinoic Acid with Gold Nanoparticles to Improve Neural Differentiation of Human Adipose Stem Cells.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2020Article
- Light-Responsive Inorganic Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020Review
- A Multiscale Model to Predict Neuronal Cell Deformation with Varying Extracellular Matrix Stiffness and Topography.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2020Article
- Biomimetic Materials and Their Utility in Modeling the 3-Dimensional Neural Environment.iScience · 2020Review
- High-Dose Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Transplantation Increases Engraftment and Neuronal Distribution and Promotes Functional Recovery in Rats after Acutely Severe Spinal Cord Injury.Stem cells international · 2019Article
- Controlled Arrangement of Neuronal Cells on Surfaces Functionalized with Micropatterned Polymer Brushes.ACS omega · 2018Article
- Biofunctionalized and self-supported polypyrrole frameworks as nanostructured ECM-like biointerfaces.RSC advances · 2018Article
- Nanotechnology for Neuroscience: Promising Approaches for Diagnostics, Therapeutics and Brain Activity Mapping.Advanced functional materials · 2017Article
- A Comparison of Lysosomal Enzymes Expression Levels in Peripheral Blood of Mild- and Severe-Alzheimer's Disease and MCI Patients: Implications for Regenerative Medicine Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- A suspended carbon fiber culture to model myelination by human Schwann cells.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2017Article
- Polymer Conformation under Confinement.Polymers · 2017Article
- Review
- The nanomaterial toolkit for neuroengineering.Nano convergence · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The mammalian brain is a phenomenal piece of "organic machinery" that has fascinated scientists and clinicians for centuries. The intricate network of tens of billions of neurons dispersed in a mixture of chemical and biochemical constituents gives rise to thoughts, feelings, memories, and life as we know it. In turn, subtle imbalances or damage to this system can cause severe complications in physical, motor, psychological, and cognitive function. Moreover, the inevitable loss of nerve tissue caused by degenerative diseases and traumatic injuries is particularly devastating because of the limited regenerative capabilities of the central nervous system (i.e., the brain and spinal cord). Among current approaches, stem-cell-based regenerative medicine has shown the greatest promise toward repairing and regenerating destroyed neural tissue. However, establishing controlled and reliable methodologies to guide stem cell differentiation into specialized neural cells of interest (e.g., neurons and oligodendrocytes) has been a prevailing challenge in the field. In this Account, we summarize the nanotechnology-based approaches our group has recently developed to guide stem-cell-based neural regeneration. We focus on three overarching strategies that were adopted to selectively control this process. First, soluble microenvironmental factors play a critical role in directing the fate of stem cells. Multiple factors have been developed in the form of small-molecule drugs, biochemical analogues, and DNA/RNA-based vectors to direct neural differentiation. However, the delivery of these factors with high transfection efficiency and minimal cytotoxicity has been challenging, especially to sensitive cell lines such as stem cells. In our first approach, we designed nanoparticle-based systems for the efficient delivery of such soluble factors to control neural differentiation. Our nanoparticles, comprising either organic or inorganic elements, were biocompatible and offered multifunctional capabilities such as imaging and delivery. Moving from the soluble microenvironment in which cells are immersed to the underlying surface, cells can sense and consequently respond to the physical microenvironment in which they reside. For instance, changes in cell adhesion, shape, and spreading are key cellular responses to surface properties of the underlying substrate. In our second approach, we modulated the surface chemistry of two-dimensional substrates to control neural stem cell morphology and the resulting differentiation process. Patterned surfaces consisting of immobilized extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and/or nanomaterials were generated and utilized to guide neuronal differentiation and polarization. In our third approach, building on the above-mentioned approaches, we further tuned the cell-ECM interactions by introducing nanotopographical features in the form of nanoparticle films or nanofiber scaffolds. Besides providing a three-dimensional surface topography, our unique nanoscaffolds were observed to enhance gene delivery, facilitate axonal alignment, and selectively control differentiation into neural cell lines of interest. Overall, nanotechnology-based approaches offer the precise physicochemical control required to generate tools suitable for applications in neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.