Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26653713›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2016

Sex differences in a rat model of risky decision making.

Caitlin A Orsini, Markie L Willis, Ryan J Gilbert, Jennifer L Bizon, Barry Setlow

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of ovarian hormones in risk aversion in female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin A OrsiniDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine.
Markie L WillisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine.
Ryan J GilbertDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida College of Medicine.
Jennifer L BizonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine.
Barry SetlowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Risk taking and cocaine use: interactions, mechanisms, and therapeutic targetsR01DA036534 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Neural mechanism of enduring cocaine effects on impulsive choiceR01DA024671 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SETLOW, BARRY · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIDA NIH HHS DA024671NIDA NIH HHS DA036534NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024671NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many debilitating psychiatric conditions, including drug addiction, are characterized by poor decision making and maladaptive risk-taking. Recent research has begun to probe this relationship to determine how brain mechanisms mediating risk-taking become compromised after chronic drug use. Currently, however, the majority of work in this field has used male subjects. Given the well-established sex differences in drug addiction, it is conceivable that such differences are also evident in risk-based decision making. To test this possibility, male and female adult rats were trained in a risky decision making task (RDT), in which they chose between a small, "safe" food reward and a large, "risky" food reward accompanied by an increasing probability of mild footshock punishment. Consistent with findings in human subjects, females were more risk averse, choosing the large, risky reward significantly less than males. This effect was not due to differences in shock reactivity or body weight, and risk-taking in females was not modulated by estrous phase. Systemic amphetamine administration decreased risk-taking in both males and females; however, females exhibited greater sensitivity to amphetamine, suggesting that dopaminergic signaling may partially account for sex differences in risk-taking. Finally, although males displayed greater instrumental responding for food reward, reward choice in the RDT was not affected by satiation, indicating that differences in motivation to obtain food reward cannot fully account for sex differences in risk-taking. These results should prove useful for developing targeted treatments for psychiatric conditions in which risk-taking is altered and that are known to differentially affect males and females.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSex CharacteristicsAmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, ClassicalDecision MakingDose-Response Relationship, DrugEstrous CycleFemaleMaleModels, AnimalRatsRats, Long-EvansReinforcement ScheduleAmphetamineCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID26653713
PMCPMC4738105
OpenAlexW2200128085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.