Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26653281›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general virology2016

Large-scale screening and characterization of enteroviruses and kobuviruses infecting pigs in Vietnam.

Nguyen Van Dung, Pham Hong Anh, Nguyen Van Cuong, Ngo Thi Hoa, Juan Carrique-Mas, Vo Be Hien, C Sharp, M Rabaa, A Berto, James Campbell and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general virology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nguyen Van DungInfection and Immunity Division, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.
Pham Hong AnhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Van CuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ngo Thi HoaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Juan Carrique-MasOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vo Be HienSubdepartment of Animal Health, Dong Thap Province, Vietnam.
C SharpInfection and Immunity Division, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.
M RabaaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
A BertoOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
James CampbellOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Stephen BakerOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jeremy FarrarOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Mark E WoolhouseCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
Juliet E BryantOxford University Clinical Research Unit, 764 Vo Van Kiet, W.1, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Peter SimmondsInfection and Immunity Division, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent survey of pigs in Dong Thap province, Vietnam identified a high frequency of enterovirus species G (EV-G) infection (144/198; 72.7%). Amongst these was a plethora of EV-G types (EV-G1, EV-G6 and four new types EV-G8-EV-G11). To better characterize the genetic diversity of EV-G and investigate the possible existence of further circulating types, we performed a larger-scale study on 484 pig and 45 farm-bred boar faecal samples collected in 2012 and 2014, respectively. All samples from the previous and current studies were also screened for kobuviruses. The overall EV infection frequency remained extremely high (395/484; 81.6%), but with comparable detection rates and viral loads between healthy and diarrhoeic pigs; this contrasted with less frequent detection of EV-G in boars (4/45; 8.9%). EV was most frequently detected in pigs ≤ 14 weeks old (∼ 95%) and declined in older pigs. Infections with EV-G1 and EV-G6 were most frequent, whilst less commonly detected types included EV-G3, EV-G4 and EV-G8-EV-G11, and five new types (EV-G12-EV-G16). In contrast, kobuvirus infection frequency was significantly higher in diarrhoeic pigs (40.9 versus 27.6%; P = 0.01). Kobuviruses also showed contrasting epizootiologies and age associations; a higher prevalence was found in boars (42%) compared with domestic pigs (29%), with the highest infection frequency amongst pigs >52 weeks old. Although genetically diverse, all kobuviruses identified belonged to the species Aichivirus C. In summary, this study confirms infection with EV-G was endemic in Vietnamese domestic pigs and exhibits high genetic diversity and extensive inter-type recombination.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiarrheaEnterovirusEnterovirus InfectionsFecesGenetic VariationKobuvirusMass ScreeningPicornaviridae InfectionsPrevalenceSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesVietnamViral Load

Identifiers

PMID26653281
PMCPMC5115164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.