Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26653203›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2015

Rationale and design of FORTH: a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of HIV self-testing in increasing HIV testing frequency among gay and bisexual men.

Muhammad S Jamil, Garrett Prestage, Christopher K Fairley, Kirsty S Smith, John M Kaldor, Andrew E Grulich, Anna M McNulty, Marcus Chen, Martin Holt, Damian P Conway and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frequent HIV Testing: Impact on HIV Risk Among Chinese Men Who Have Sex with Men.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Muhammad S JamilThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Mjamil@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Garrett PrestageThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Gprestage@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Christopher K FairleyCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. cfairley@mshc.org.au.
Kirsty S SmithThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Ksmith@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
John M KaldorThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Jkaldor@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Andrew E GrulichThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Agrulich@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Anna M McNultySydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Anna.McNulty@SESIAHS.HEALTH.NSW.GOV.AU.
Marcus ChenCentral Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. MChen@mshc.org.au.
Martin HoltCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. m.holt@unsw.edu.au.
Damian P ConwayThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Dconway@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Handan WandThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. hwand@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Phillip KeenThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Pkeen@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Colin BatrouneyVictorian AIDS Council/Gay Men's Health Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Colin.Batrouney@vac.org.au.
Jack BradleyThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Jbradley@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Benjamin R BavintonThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Bbavinton@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
Dermot RyanACON, Sydney, NSW, Australia. DRyan@acon.org.au.
Darren RussellCairns Sexual Health Service, Cairns North, QLD, Australia. Darren.Russell@health.qld.gov.au.
Rebecca J GuyThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Rguy@kirby.unsw.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGay and bisexual men (GBM) are a major risk group for HIV acquisition, yet the majority of higher-risk GBM test for HIV less often than recommended (3-6 monthly). HIV self-testing has the potential to increase testing frequency and improve awareness of personal HIV status. HIV self-tests have been approved in some countries, however there are concerns whether self-testing would increase HIV testing frequency enough to compensate for the reduced sensitivity of self-tests in early infection. We describe here a randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of self-testing in increasing HIV testing frequency among higher-risk GBM, and its acceptability. METHODS/

designParticipants are higher-risk HIV negative GBM (>5 partners or condomless anal intercourse in previous 3 months; n = 350), including 50 GBM who tested for HIV over two years ago or never tested before ('infrequent-testers'). Participants are recruited from sexual health clinics and community-based organisations, and randomised 1:1 to either self-testing or standard-care (routine clinic-based testing) arms. The trial employs a wait-list control design: participants in the standard-care arm switch to self-testing arm in the second year, and gain access to self-test kits. Participants in the self-testing arm receive four oral-fluid self-test kits at enrolment, with additional kits provided on request. Demographics, sexual behaviour and HIV testing preferences are collected at baseline, and the frequency and pattern of HIV and sexually transmissible infection (STI) testing is collected via online 3-monthly questionnaires. The acceptability of self-testing is assessed at 12 months via an online questionnaire and in-depth interviews. A 24-h telephone support is provided, with expedited follow-up of those with reactive self-test results. The primary outcome is HIV testing frequency (mean number of HIV tests per person) over 12 months, and the secondary outcomes are: mean number of STI tests (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis) per person; reasons for HIV testing; and acceptability of HIV self-testing. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial to evaluate the use of self-testing among GBM in Australia, and the first internationally among infrequent testers. The study will provide evidence on whether self-testing increases HIV testing frequency, and its acceptability among GBM. The findings will improve our understanding of self-testing patterns, and whether GBM supplement or replace their existing testing routine.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registration number: ACTRN12613001236785 , registered on November 12, 2013.

Indexed as

BisexualityHomosexualityAdultAustraliaFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHotlinesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningNew ZealandSerologic TestsSexually Transmitted DiseasesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26653203
PMCPMC4676114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.