Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26653146›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2015

The effectiveness of workplace interventions to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behaviour in adults: protocol for a systematic review.

Christina C Loitz, Robert J Potter, Jessica L Walker, Nicole C McLeod, Nora J Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Obesity in Older Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Does Working Environment Add Vulnerability?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina C LoitzAlberta Centre for Active Living, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 3rd floor, 11759 Groat Road, T5M 3K6, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. cloitz@ualberta.ca.
Robert J PotterAlberta Centre for Active Living, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 3rd floor, 11759 Groat Road, T5M 3K6, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. rpotter@ualberta.ca.
Jessica L WalkerAlberta Centre for Active Living, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 3rd floor, 11759 Groat Road, T5M 3K6, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. jwalker3@ualberta.ca.
Nicole C McLeodUWALK, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 3rd floor, 11759 Groat Road, T5M 3K6, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ncmcleod@ualberta.ca.
Nora J JohnstonAlberta Centre for Active Living, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 3rd floor, 11759 Groat Road, T5M 3K6, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. nora.johnston@ualberta.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA physically active lifestyle plays a preventative role in the development of various chronic diseases and mental health conditions. Unfortunately, few adults achieve the minimum amount of physical activity and spend excessive time sitting. Developing targeted interventions to increase active living among adults is an important endeavour for public health. One plausible context to reach adults is the workplace. This systematic review aims to review the effectiveness of workplace interventions on increasing physical activity and decreasing sedentary behaviour in the workplace.

methodsAn advisory group of practitioners will work in collaboration with the research team to inform the systematic review and knowledge mobilization. Fifteen electronic databases will be searched to identify studies examining the effectiveness of workplace interventions on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. All experimental designs and observational studies (non-experimental intervention studies) meeting the study criteria will be included. Studies examining generally healthy, employed, adult participants will be included for the review. Interventions will focus on increasing physical activity and/or decreasing sedentary behaviour from the individual to policy level. The primary outcome variables will be reported or observed physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour in the workplace. Secondary outcomes will include variables ranging from return on investment to quality of life. Study quality will be assessed for risk of bias following the protocol identified in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and supplemented by the guidelines developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care group, using RevMan. The quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analyses, forest plots, and harvest plots will be used where appropriate to assess the direction, size, and consistency of the intervention effect across the studies using similar intervention strategies. Follow-up knowledge mobilization activities and products will be developed to support the use of this knowledge in practice. DISCUSSION: This protocol paper describes a systematic review assessing the effectiveness of various types of workplace interventions on increasing physical activity and decreasing sedentary behaviour at work. Collaborating with an advisory group of potential knowledge users throughout the process postulates a greater use and reach of the information gained from this systematic review by knowledge users. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015019398.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorSedentary BehaviorAdultHealth PromotionHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID26653146
PMCPMC4676873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.