Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26652308›Full record

ArticlemAbs2016

Assessing kinetic and epitopic diversity across orthogonal monoclonal antibody generation platforms.

Yasmina Noubia Abdiche, Rian Harriman, Xiaodi Deng, Yik Andy Yeung, Adam Miles, Winse Morishige, Leila Boustany, Lei Zhu, Shelley Mettler Izquierdo, William Harriman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Humanization of Chicken-Derived Antibodies by Yeast Surface Display.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutic Antibodies Targeting Potassium Ion Channels.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yasmina Noubia Abdichea Protein Engineering, Rinat-Pfizer Inc. , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Rian Harrimanb Crystal Bioscience , CA , USA.
Xiaodi Denga Protein Engineering, Rinat-Pfizer Inc. , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Yik Andy Yeunga Protein Engineering, Rinat-Pfizer Inc. , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Adam Milesc Wasatch Microfluidics , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.
Winse Morishigea Protein Engineering, Rinat-Pfizer Inc. , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Leila Boustanya Protein Engineering, Rinat-Pfizer Inc. , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
Lei Zhub Crystal Bioscience , CA , USA.
Shelley Mettler Izquierdob Crystal Bioscience , CA , USA.
William Harrimanb Crystal Bioscience , CA , USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USCarterra (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to target specific antigens with high precision has led to an increasing demand to generate them for therapeutic use in many disease areas. Historically, the discovery of therapeutic mAbs has relied upon the immunization of mammals and various in vitro display technologies. While the routine immunization of rodents yields clones that are stable in serum and have been selected against vast arrays of endogenous, non-target self-antigens, it is often difficult to obtain species cross-reactive mAbs owing to the generally high sequence similarity shared across human antigens and their mammalian orthologs. In vitro display technologies bypass this limitation, but lack an in vivo screening mechanism, and thus may potentially generate mAbs with undesirable binding specificity and stability issues. Chicken immunization is emerging as an attractive mAb discovery method because it combines the benefits of both in vivo and in vitro display methods. Since chickens are phylogenetically separated from mammals, their proteins share less sequence homology with those of humans, so human proteins are often immunogenic and can readily elicit rodent cross-reactive clones, which are necessary for in vivo proof of mechanism studies. Here, we compare the binding characteristics of mAbs isolated from chicken immunization, mouse immunization, and phage display of human antibody libraries. Our results show that chicken-derived mAbs not only recapitulate the kinetic diversity of mAbs sourced from other methods, but appear to offer an expanded repertoire of epitopes. Further, chicken-derived mAbs can bind their native serum antigen with very high affinity, highlighting their therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody SpecificityAvian ProteinsBinding Sites, AntibodyChickensEpitopesFemaleHumansKineticsMiceSpecies SpecificityAntibodies, MonoclonalAvian ProteinsEpitopesBinningchicken immune repertoireepitopeImmunologymonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID26652308
PMCPMC4966639
OpenAlexW2208046141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.