Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26652172›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Evaluating a train-the-trainer approach for improving capacity for evidence-based decision making in public health.

Laura Yarber, Carol A Brownson, Rebekah R Jacob, Elizabeth A Baker, Ellen Jones, Carsten Baumann, Anjali D Deshpande, Kathleen N Gillespie, Darcell P Scharff, Ross C Brownson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04007419 (Promotoras de Donación), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04007419 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Promotoras de Donación: Leveraging Community Health Workers to Increase Donor Registration of Older Hispanics

TypeinterventionalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled621ConditionsOrgan Donation, Donor Designation/RegistrationArmsHealth Promoters and Organ Donation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Psychosocial Impact of Cleft Lip and/or Palate on Caregivers and Individuals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lessons Learned from Community Partners: Strengthening a Mini-grants Process to Advance Health Equity.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura YarberCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. lyarber@gmail.com.
Carol A BrownsonPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. cbrownson2@gmail.com.
Rebekah R JacobPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. rebekahjacob@wustl.edu.
Elizabeth A BakerCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. bakerpa@slu.edu.
Ellen JonesSchool of Health Related Professions, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA. ejones@msphi.org.
Carsten BaumannDepartment of Public Health and Environment, Health Statistics and Evaluation Branch, Denver, CO, USA. carsten.baumann@state.co.us.
Anjali D DeshpandeDivision of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. ADESHPAN@DOM.wustl.edu.
Kathleen N GillespieCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. gilleskn@slu.edu.
Darcell P ScharffCollege for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. scharffd@slu.edu.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. rbrownson@brownschool.wustl.edu.
Saint Louis University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USColorado Department of Public Health and Environment · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Worksite Policies and neighborhood Influences on Obesity and Cancer RiskU54CA155496 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2011 to 2016
$9.0M
HPDPRC SIP 13-66U48DP001903 · DP · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, ELIZABETH A · 2009 to 2013
$7.3M
Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions to Control CancerR01CA160327 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2012 to 2017
$2.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001903NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48/DP001903NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA160327NCI NIH HHS 5U54CA155496-04NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160327NCI NIH HHS U54 CA155496NIDDK NIH HHS 1P30DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based public health gives public health practitioners the tools they need to make choices based on the best and most current evidence. An evidence-based public health training course developed in 1997 by the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis has been taught by a transdisciplinary team multiple times with positive results. In order to scale up evidence-based practices, a train-the-trainer initiative was launched in 2010.

methodsThis study examines the outcomes achieved among participants of courses led by trained state-level faculty. Participants from trainee-led courses in four states (Indiana, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas) over three years were asked to complete an online survey. Attempts were made to contact 317 past participants. One-hundred forty-four (50.9 %) reachable participants were included in analysis. Outcomes measured include frequency of use of materials, resources, and other skills or tools from the course; reasons for not using the materials and resources; and benefits from attending the course. Survey responses were tabulated and compared using Chi-square tests.

resultsAmong the most commonly reported benefits, 88 % of respondents agreed that they acquired knowledge about a new subject, 85 % saw applications for the knowledge to their work, and 78 % agreed the course also improved abilities to make scientifically informed decisions at work. The most commonly reported reasons for not using course content as much as intended included not having enough time to implement evidence-based approaches (42 %); other staff/peers lack training (34 %); and not enough funding for continued training (34 %). The study findings suggest that utilization of course materials and teachings remains relatively high across practitioner groups, whether they were taught by the original trainers or by state-based trainers.

conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that train-the-trainer is an effective method for broadly disseminating evidence-based public health principles. Train-the-trainer is less costly than the traditional method and allows for courses to be tailored to local issues, thus making it a viable approach to dissemination and scale up of new public health practices.

Indexed as

AdultDecision MakingEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services ResearchHumansIndianaKansasLeadershipProfessional CompetenceProgram EvaluationPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID26652172
PMCPMC4676893
OpenAlexW2192037502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.