Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26652085›Full record

ReviewGlobal journal of health science2015

Suicide Prevention and Follow-Up Services: A Narrative Review.

Behrooz Ghanbari, Seyed Kazem Malakouti, Marzieh Nojomi, Kaveh Alavi, Shiva Khaleghparast

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global journal of health science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04775160 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Intervention for Secondary Prevention of Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior: a Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez DíazRan2022 to 2025Enrolled220ConditionsSuicideArmsSmartSafe
NCT07120477 phase4suspendednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Esketamine Versus Crisis Response Planning Versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual for Suicide Prevention: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial in a Brazilian Municipality (SAVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2026 to 2029Enrolled468ConditionsSuicide Prevention, Ketamine, Crisis Response PlanArmsIntravenous Esketamine, Crisis Response Planning intervention (structures safety planning)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Behrooz GhanbariMental Health Research Center (MHRC), Tehran Institute of Psychiatry, Faculty of behavioral sciences and mental health, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.. g.behrooz@gmail.com.
Seyed Kazem Malakouti
Marzieh Nojomi
Kaveh Alavi
Shiva Khaleghparast

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous suicide attempt is the most important predictor of death by suicide. Thus preventive interventions after attempting to suicide is essential to prevent reattempts. This paper attempts to determine whether phone preventive interventions or other vehicles (postal cards, email and case management) are effective in reattempt prevention and health promotion after discharge by providing an overview of studies on suicide reattempts. The research investigated in this review conducted from 1995 to 2014. A total of 26 cases related to the aim of this research were derived from 36 English articles with the aforementioned keywords Research shows that providing comprehensive aids, social support, and follow-up after discharge can significantly prevent suicide reattempts. Several studies showed that follow-up support (phone calls, crisis cards, mails, postal cards.) after discharge can significantly decrease the risk of suicide. More randomized controlled trials (RCT) are required to determine what factors of follow-up are more effective than other methods.

Indexed as

Social SupportSuicide PreventionCase ManagementElectronic MailHumansPostal ServiceSuicide, AttemptedTelephone

Identifiers

PMID26652085
PMCPMC4877223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.