Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26651958›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2016

Locally advanced esophageal cancer: What becomes of 5-year survivors?

Galal Ghaly, Mohamed Kamel, Abu Nasar, Subroto Paul, Paul C Lee, Jeffrey L Port, Paul J Christos, Brendon M Stiles, Nasser K Altorki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Galal GhalyDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY.
Mohamed KamelDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY.
Abu NasarDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY.
Subroto PaulDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY.
Paul C LeeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY.
Jeffrey L PortDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY.
Paul J ChristosDivision of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Brendon M StilesDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY.
Nasser K AltorkiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York, NY. Electronic address: nkaltork@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR000457-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the long-term outcomes of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) who underwent esophagectomy and survived at least 5 years, and the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) beyond 5 years.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of a prospective database to identify patients with clinical stage T2N0M0 or higher LAEC. Medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics, as well as data on recurrence and survival. Multivariable analysis of predictors of DFS beyond 5 years was performed using a Cox regression model.

resultsBetween 1988 and 2009, 355 of 500 patients underwent esophagectomy for cT2N0M0 or higher disease. Of these 355 patients, 126 were alive and disease-free at the 5-year follow-up, for an actuarial 5-year DFS of 33%. Recurrent esophageal cancer developed in 8 patients after 5 years. Among the 126 surviving patients, the actuarial overall survival was 94% at 7 years and 80% at 10 years. On multivariable analysis, the sole significant predictor of DFS after the 5-year time point was non-en bloc resection at the original operation (P = .006). Pulmonary-related deaths accounted for 10 out of 22 noncancer deaths. A second primary cancer developed in 23 of the 126 surviving patients.

conclusionsProlonged survival can be obtained in one-third of patients with LAEC. An en bloc resection at the original operation is the most significant predictor of prolonged survival. Survivors experience a high rate of second primary cancer and an apparently high rate of deaths from pulmonary disease. Careful follow-up is necessary for these patients, even after the 5-year mark.

Indexed as

EsophagectomySurvivorsAgedCause of DeathDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm Stagingdisease-free survivalen bloc resectionesophageal cancerrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID26651958
PMCPMC5182511
OpenAlexW2236421989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.