Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26651830›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2015

Swiss family physicians' perceptions and attitudes towards knowledge translation practices.

Theresa Bengough, Emilie Bovet, Camille Bécherraz, Susanne Schlegel, Bernard Burnand, Vincent Pidoux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theresa BengoughAustrian Federal institute of Health Care (ÖBIG), Stubenring 6, AT-1010, Vienna, Austria. theresa.bengough@gmail.com.
Emilie BovetInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Biopôle 2 / Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland. emilie.bovet@chuv.ch.
Camille BécherrazInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Biopôle 2 / Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland. camille.becherraz@hesav.ch.
Susanne SchlegelInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Biopôle 2 / Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland. susanne.schlegel@unil.ch.
Bernard BurnandInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Biopôle 2 / Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland. bernard.burnand@chuv.ch.
Vincent PidouxInstitute of social and preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Biopôle 2 / Route de la Corniche 10, CH-1010, Lausanne, Switzerland. vincent.pidoux@chuv.ch.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have been performed to understand the way family physicians apply knowledge from medical research in practice. However, very little is known concerning family physicians in Switzerland. In an environment in which information constantly accumulates, it is crucial to identify the major sources of scientific information that are used by family physicians to keep their medical knowledge up to date and barriers to use these sources. Our main objective was to examine medical knowledge translation (KT) practices of Swiss family physicians.

methodsThe population consisted of French- and German-speaking private practice physicians specialised in family medicine. We conducted four interviews and three focus groups (n = 25). The interview guides of the semi-structured interviews and focus groups focused on (a) ways and means used by physicians to keep updated with information relevant to clinical practice; (b) how they consider their role in translating knowledge into practice; (c) potential barriers to KT; (d) solutions proposed by physicians for effective KT.

resultsFamily physicians find themselves rather ambivalent about the translation of knowledge based on scientific literature, but generally express much interest in KT. They often feel overwhelmed by "information floods" and perceive clinical practice guidelines and other supports to be of limited usefulness for their practice. They often combine various formal and informal information sources to keep their knowledge up to date. Swiss family physicians report considering themselves as artisans, caring for patients with complex needs.

conclusionImproved performance of KT initiatives in family medicine should be tailored to actual needs and based on high quality evidence-based sources.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerceptionQuality Assurance, Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitude of Health PersonnelFamily PracticeFocus GroupsHumansPhysicians, FamilyRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID26651830
PMCPMC4676124
OpenAlexW2195191041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.