Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26651822›Full record

ReviewTrials2015

Recruitment and retention in obesity prevention and treatment trials targeting minority or low-income children: a review of the clinical trials registration database.

Zhaohui Cui, Elisabeth M Seburg, Nancy E Sherwood, Myles S Faith, Dianne S Ward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Testing theChildhood obesity (Print) · 2026
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaohui CuiDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2202 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Campus Box 7461, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. cuiz@email.unc.edu.
Elisabeth M SeburgHealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Elisabeth.M.Seburg@HealthPartners.com.
Nancy E SherwoodHealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Nancy.E.Sherwood@HealthPartners.com.
Myles S FaithDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2202 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Campus Box 7461, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. mfaith@email.unc.edu.
Dianne S WardDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2202 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Campus Box 7461, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. dsward@email.unc.edu.

Funding

Obesity and Energy Metabolism CoreP30DK050456 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BERNLOHR, DAVID A · 1995 to 2015
$17.0M
Clinic, Family & Community Collaboration to Treat Overweight and Obese ChildrenU01HL103629 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROBINSON, THOMAS N. · 2010 to 2016
$12.6M
TARGETING OBESITY AND BLOOD PRESSURE IN URBAN YOUTHU01HL103622 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BORAWSKI, ELAINE A., MOORE, SHIRLEY M · 2010 to 2016
$12.2M
Growing Right Onto Wellness (GROW): Changing Early Childhood BMI TrajectoriesU01HL103620 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BARKIN, SHARI · 2010 to 2016
$11.9M
Linking Primary Care, Communities and Families to Prevent Obesity Among PreschoolU01HD068890 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FRENCH, SIMONE A., SHERWOOD, NANCY E. · 2010 to 2016
$11.0M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research Coordinating UnitU01HL103561 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STEVENS, JUNE · 2010 to 2017
$7.0M
Linking home environments and primary care: Obesity prevention for 2-5 year oldsR21DK078239 · NIDDK · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI SHERWOOD, NANCY E. · 2009 to 2010
$412k
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL103561NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL103620NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL103622NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL103629NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD068890NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050456NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK050456NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK078239NIDDK NIH HHS R21DK078239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to recruit and retain participants in clinical trials are challenging, especially in studies that include minority or low-income children. To date, no studies have systematically examined recruitment and retention strategies and their effectiveness in working successfully with this population. We examined strategies employed to recruit or retain minority or low-income children in trials that included an obesity-related behavior modification component.

methodsFirst, completed home-, community-, and school-based trials involving minority or low-income children aged 2-17 years were identified in a search of the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Second, a PubMed search of identified trials was conducted to locate publications pertinent to identified trials. Recruitment and retention rates were calculated for studies that included relevant information.

resultsOur final analytic sample included 43 studies. Of these, 25 studies reported recruitment or retention strategies, with the amount of information varying from a single comment to several pages; 4 published no specific information on recruitment or retention; and 14 had no publications listed in PubMed. The vast majority (92 %) of the 25 studies reported retention rates of, on average, 86 %. Retention rates were lower in studies that: targeted solely Hispanics or African Americans (vs. mixed races of African Americans, whites, and others); involved children and parents (vs. children only); focused on overweight or obese children (vs. general children), lasted ≥1 year (vs. <1 year), were home or community-based (vs. school-based), included nutrition and physical activity intervention (vs. either intervention alone), had body mass index or other anthropometrics as primary outcome measures (vs. obesity-related behavior, insulin sensitivity, etc.). Retention rates did not vary based on child age, number of intervention sessions, or sample size.

conclusionsVariable amounts of information were provided on recruitment and retention strategies in obesity-related trials involving minority or low-income children. Although reported retention rates were fairly high, a lack of reporting limited the available information. More and consistent reporting and systematic cataloging of recruitment and retention methods are needed. In addition, qualitative and quantitative studies to inform evidence-based decisions in the selection of effective recruitment and retention strategies for trials including minority or low-income children are warranted.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsPatient DropoutsPatient SelectionPovertyRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentAge FactorsBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolClinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualDietExercise TherapyFemaleHealth Behavior

Identifiers

PMID26651822
PMCPMC4674912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.