ReviewExpert review of gastroenterology & hepatology2016
Evolving techniques for gastrointestinal endoscopic hemostasis treatment.
Review in Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Ischemic colitis as a cause of severe hematochezia: A mini review.Journal of clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Hazardous repeat bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in a patient with immune thrombocytopenia: complete hemostasis using an over-the-scope clip.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Potential role of new technological innovations in nonvariceal hemorrhage.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2019Article
- Devices for endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal GI bleeding (with videos).VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With mortality due to gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding remaining stable, the focus on endoscopic hemostasis has been on improving other outcomes such as rebleeding rate, need for transfusions, and need for angiographic embolization or surgery. Over the past few years, a number of devices have emerged to help endoscopically assess and treat bleeding GI lesions. These include the Doppler endoscopic probe, hemostatic powder, and over-the-scope clip. Also, new applications have been described for radiofrequency ablation. In this article, we will discuss these evolving tools and techniques that have been developed, including an analysis of their efficacy and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.