Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26651386›Full record

ArticleACS combinatorial science2016

Direct Phenotypic Screening in Mice: Identification of Individual, Novel Antinociceptive Compounds from a Library of 734,821 Pyrrolidine Bis-piperazines.

Richard A Houghten, Michelle L Ganno, Jay P McLaughlin, Colette T Dooley, Shainnel O Eans, Radleigh G Santos, Travis LaVoi, Adel Nefzi, Greg Welmaker, Marc A Giulianotti and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS combinatorial science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard A HoughtenTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Michelle L GannoTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Jay P McLaughlinTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Colette T DooleyTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Shainnel O EansTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Radleigh G SantosTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Travis LaVoiTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Adel NefziTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Greg WelmakerTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Marc A GiulianottiTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Lawrence TollTorrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies , 11350 Southwest Village Parkway, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987, United States.
Torrey Pines Institute For Molecular Studies · US

Funding

High throughput in vivo screening: translational generation of novel analgesicsR01DA031370 · NIDA · TORREY PINES INST FOR MOLECULAR STUDIES · PI HOUGHTEN, RICHARD ALLEN · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01DA031370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis in the current study is that the simultaneous direct in vivo testing of thousands to millions of systematically arranged mixture-based libraries will facilitate the identification of enhanced individual compounds. Individual compounds identified from such libraries may have increased specificity and decreased side effects early in the discovery phase. Testing began by screening ten diverse scaffolds as single mixtures (ranging from 17,340 to 4,879,681 compounds) for analgesia directly in the mouse tail withdrawal model. The "all X" mixture representing the library TPI-1954 was found to produce significant antinociception and lacked respiratory depression and hyperlocomotor effects using the Comprehensive Laboratory Animal Monitoring System (CLAMS). The TPI-1954 library is a pyrrolidine bis-piperazine and totals 738,192 compounds. This library has 26 functionalities at the first three positions of diversity made up of 28,392 compounds each (26 × 26 × 42) and 42 functionalities at the fourth made up of 19,915 compounds each (26 × 26 × 26). The 120 resulting mixtures representing each of the variable four positions were screened directly in vivo in the mouse 55 °C warm-water tail-withdrawal assay (ip administration). The 120 samples were then ranked in terms of their antinociceptive activity. The synthesis of 54 individual compounds was then carried out. Nine of the individual compounds produced dose-dependent antinociception equivalent to morphine. In practical terms what this means is that one would not expect multiexponential increases in activity as we move from the all-X mixture, to the positional scanning libraries, to the individual compounds. Actually because of the systematic formatting one would typically anticipate steady increases in activity as the complexity of the mixtures is reduced. This is in fact what we see in the current study. One of the final individual compounds identified, TPI 2213-17, lacked significant respiratory depression, locomotor impairment, or sedation. Our results represent an example of this unique approach for screening large mixture-based libraries directly in vivo to rapidly identify individual compounds.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnimalsCombinatorial Chemistry TechniquesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPainPiperazinesPyrrolidinesSmall Molecule LibrariesAnalgesicsPiperazinesPyrrolidinesSmall Molecule Librariesanalgesiain vivo high-throughput screeningmixture-based combinatorial librariesopioid

Identifiers

PMID26651386
PMCPMC4710894
OpenAlexW2222877792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.