Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26651331›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

Seniors managing multiple medications: using mixed methods to view the home care safety lens.

Ariella Lang, Marilyn Macdonald, Patricia Marck, Lynn Toon, Melissa Griffin, Tony Easty, Kimberly Fraser, Neil MacKinnon, Jonathan Mitchell, Eddy Lang and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 'It's a job to be done'. Managing polypharmacy at home: A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of older people living with frailty.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ariella LangVictorian Order of Nurses (VON Canada), Ottawa, ON, Canada. ariella.lang@sympatico.ca.
Marilyn MacdonaldDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova, Scotia, Canada. marilyn.macdonald@dal.ca.
Patricia MarckUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. pmarck@uvic.ca.
Lynn ToonVictorian Order of Nurses (VON Canada), Ottawa, ON, Canada. lgtoon@gmail.com.
Melissa GriffinUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. melissa.c.griffin@gmail.com.
Tony EastyUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Tony.Easty@uhn.ca.
Kimberly FraserUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. kdfraser@ualberta.ca.
Neil MacKinnonUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. RxDeanMac@UC.edu.
Jonathan MitchellAccreditation Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Jonathan.Mitchell@accreditation.ca.
Eddy LangAlberta Health Services/University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. eddy.lang@albertahealthservices.ca.
Sharon GoodwinVictorian Order of Nurses (VON Canada), Ottawa, ON, Canada. Sharon.goodwin@von.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety is a national and international priority with medication safety earmarked as both a prevalent and high-risk area of concern. To date, medication safety research has focused overwhelmingly on institutional based care provided by paid healthcare professionals, which often has little applicability to the home care setting. This critical gap in our current understanding of medication safety in the home care sector is particularly evident with the elderly who often manage more than one chronic illness and a complex palette of medications, along with other care needs. This study addresses the medication management issues faced by seniors with chronic illnesses, their family, caregivers, and paid providers within Canadian publicly funded home care programs in Alberta (AB), Ontario (ON), Quebec (QC) and Nova Scotia (NS).

methodsInformed by a socio-ecological perspective, this study utilized Interpretive Description (ID) methodology and participatory photographic methods to capture and analyze a range of visual and textual data. Three successive phases of data collection and analysis were conducted in a concurrent, iterative fashion in eight urban and/or rural households in each province. A total of 94 participants (i.e., seniors receiving home care services, their family/caregivers, and paid providers) were interviewed individually. In addition, 69 providers took part in focus groups. Analysis was iterative and concurrent with data collection in that each interview was compared with subsequent interviews for converging as well as diverging patterns.

resultsSix patterns were identified that provide a rich portrayal of the complexity of medication management safety in home care: vulnerabilities that impact the safe management and storage of medication, sustaining adequate supports, degrees of shared accountability for care, systems of variable effectiveness, poly-literacy required to navigate the system, and systemic challenges to maintaining medication safety in the home.

conclusionsThere is a need for policy makers, health system leaders, care providers, researchers, and educators to work with home care clients and caregivers on three key messages for improvement: adapt care delivery models to the home care landscape; develop a palette of user-centered tools to support medication safety in the home; and strengthen health systems integration.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPolypharmacyAgedAlbertaCaregiversHome Care ServicesHumansMedication Therapy ManagementNova ScotiaOntarioPatient SatisfactionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality of Health CareQuebecSafety Management

Identifiers

PMID26651331
PMCPMC4677040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.