Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26651022›Full record

Trial reportJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Effect of Sucralfate on the Relative Bioavailability of Enrofloxacin and Ciprofloxacin in Healthy Fed Dogs.

K KuKanich, B KuKanich, S Guess, E Heinrich

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ciprofloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Clinical Canine Patients.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K KuKanichDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
B KuKanichDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
S GuessDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
E HeinrichDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Kansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSucralfate impairs absorption of ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in humans, but no sucralfate-fluoroquinolone interaction has been reported in dogs. Veterinary formularies recommend avoiding concurrent administration of these medications, which might impact compliance, therapeutic success, and resistance selection from fluoroquinolones.

objectivesTo determine whether a drug interaction exists when sucralfate is administered to fed dogs concurrently with ciprofloxacin or enrofloxacin, and whether a 2 hour delay between fluoroquinolone and sucralfate affects fluoroquinolone absorption. ANIMALS: Five healthy Greyhounds housed in a research colony.

methodsThis was a randomized crossover study. Treatments included oral ciprofloxacin (C) or oral enrofloxacin (E) alone, each fluoroquinolone concurrently with an oral suspension of sucralfate (CS, ES), and sucralfate suspension 2 hours after each fluoroquinolone (C2S, E2S). Fluoroquinolone concentrations were evaluated using liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry.

resultsDrug exposure of ciprofloxacin was highly variable (AUC 5.52-22.47 h μg/mL) compared to enrofloxacin (AUC 3.86-7.50 h μg/mL). The mean relative bioavailability for ciprofloxacin and concurrent sucralfate was 48% (range 8-143%) compared to ciprofloxacin alone. Relative bioavailability of ciprofloxacin improved to 87% (range 37-333%) when sucralfate was delayed by 2 hours. By contrast, relative bioavailability for enrofloxacin and concurrent sucralfate was 104% (94-115%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A possible clinically relevant drug interaction for the relative bioavailability of ciprofloxacin with sucralfate was found. No significant difference in bioavailability was documented for enrofloxacin with sucralfate. Further research is warranted in fasted dogs and clinical cases requiring enrofloxacin or other approved fluoroquinolones in combination with sucralfate.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCiprofloxacinCross-Over StudiesDogsDrug Administration ScheduleEnrofloxacinFluoroquinolonesHalf-LifeSucralfateAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Ulcer AgentsCiprofloxacinEnrofloxacinFluoroquinolonesSucralfateCanineDrug interactionFluoroquinolonePharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID26651022
PMCPMC4913628
OpenAlexW2195844333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.