Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26650730›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2016

Mobile thrombus on cardiac implantable electronic device leads of patients undergoing cardiac ablation: incidence, management, and outcomes.

Alan Sugrue, Christopher V DeSimone, Charles J Lenz, Douglas L Packer, Samuel J Asirvatham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of pacemaker lead thrombus.HeartRhythm case reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan SugrueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Christopher V DeSimoneDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Charles J LenzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Douglas L PackerDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Samuel J AsirvathamDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. asirvatham.samuel@mayo.edu.

Funding

CARDIOVASOLOGYT32HL007111 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Barry A. Borlaug · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
Genes of Hypertension in African AmericansR01HL070111 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI KOTCHEN, THEODORE · 2003 to 2006
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL070111NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe rates of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations and cardiac ablation procedures are increasing worldwide. To date, the management of CIED lead thrombi in the peri-ablation period remains undefined and key clinical management questions remained unanswered. We sought to describe the clinical course and management strategies of patients with a CIED lead thrombus detected in the peri-ablative setting.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a cardiac ablation procedure at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2000 to 2014. Patients were included in our study cohort if they had documented CIED lead thrombus noted on peri-ablation imaging studies. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the overall management strategy, outcomes, and embolic complications in these patients.

resultsOur overall cohort included 1833 patients, with 27 (1.4 %) having both cardiac ablation procedures as well as CIED lead thrombus detected on imaging. Of these 27 patients, 21 were male (77 %), and the mean age was 59.2 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 16.5 months (range 3 days-48.3 months). Anticoagulation was an effective therapeutic strategy, with 11/14 (78.6 %) patients experiencing either resolution of the thrombus or reduction in size on re-imaging. For atrial fibrillation ablation, the most common management strategy was a deferment in ablation with initiation/intensification of anticoagulation medication. For ventricular tachycardia ablations, most procedures involved a modified approach with the use of a retrograde aortic approach to access the left ventricle. No patient had any documented embolic complications.

conclusionsThe incidence of lead thrombi in patients undergoing an ablation was small in our study cohort (1.4 %). Anticoagulation and deferral of ablation represented successful management strategies for atrial fibrillation ablation. For patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation, a modified approach using retrograde aortic access to the ventricle was successful. In patients who are not on warfarin anticoagulation at the time of thrombus detection, we recommend initiation of this medication, with a goal INR of 2-3. For patients on warfarin at the time of thrombus detection, we recommend an intensification of anticoagulation with a goal INR of 3.0.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesCatheter AblationDevice RemovalElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsThrombosisTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsCardiac ablationCardiovascular implantable electronic devicesLead thrombus

Identifiers

PMID26650730
PMCPMC4900939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.