Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26650625›Full record

ArticleProteins2016

Water and ion permeability of a claudin model: A computational study.

Rozita Laghaei, Alan S L Yu, Rob D Coalson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rozita LaghaeiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260.
Alan S L YuKidney Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Rob D CoalsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Structure-Function Studies of Tight Junction Membrane ProteinsU01GM094627 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI COALSON, ROB DUNCAN · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM094627NIGMS NIH HHS U01GM094627-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, the three-dimensional structure of the multimeric paracellular claudin pore is unknown. Using extant biophysical data concerning the size of the pore and permeation of water and cations through it, two three-dimensional models of the pore are constructed in silico. Molecular Dynamics (MD) calculations are then performed to compute water and sodium ion permeation fluxes under the influence of applied hydrostatic pressure. Comparison to experiment is made, under the assumption that the hydrostatic pressure applied in the simulations is equivalent to osmotic pressure induced in experimental measurements of water/ion permeability. One model, in which pore-lining charged is distributed evenly over a selectivity filter section 10-16 Å in length, is found to be generally consistent with experimental data concerning the dependence of water and ion permeation on channel pore diameter, pore length, and the sign and magnitude of pore lining charge. The molecular coupling mechanism between water and ion flow under conditions where hydrostatic pressure is applied is computationally elucidated.

Indexed as

ClaudinsHydrostatic PressureMolecular Dynamics SimulationOsmolar ConcentrationPermeabilityProtein Structure, QuaternarySodiumWaterClaudinsSodiumWaterclaudinclaudin-2grapheneion channelsion permeationnanotubewater permeation

Identifiers

PMID26650625
PMCPMC4939073
OpenAlexW2196190318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.