Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26650614›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2016

A self-encoded capsid derivative restricts Ty1 retrotransposition in Saccharomyces.

David J Garfinkel, Jessica M Tucker, Agniva Saha, Yuri Nishida, Katarzyna Pachulska-Wieczorek, Leszek Błaszczyk, Katarzyna J Purzycka

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Capsid flexibility during Ty1 virus-like particle assembly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David J GarfinkelDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA. djgarf@bmb.uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6234-2426
Jessica M TuckerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.
Agniva SahaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.
Yuri NishidaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.
Katarzyna Pachulska-WieczorekDepartment of Structural Chemistry and Biology of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Leszek BłaszczykInstitute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna J PurzyckaDepartment of Structural Chemistry and Biology of Nucleic Acids, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
University of Georgia · USInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLPoznań University of Technology · PL

Funding

Antisense RNAs control retrotransposon copy numberR01GM095622 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI GARFINKEL, DAVID J. · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM095622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrotransposons and retroviral insertions have molded the genomes of many eukaryotes. Since retroelements transpose via an RNA intermediate, the additive nature of the replication cycle can result in massive increases in copy number if left unchecked. Host organisms have countered with several defense systems, including domestication of retroelement genes that now act as restriction factors to minimize propagation. We discovered a novel truncated form of the Saccharomyces Ty1 retrotransposon capsid protein, dubbed p22 that inhibits virus-like particle (VLP) assembly and function. The p22 restriction factor expands the repertoire of defense proteins targeting the capsid and highlights a novel host-parasite strategy. Instead of inhibiting all transposition by domesticating the restriction gene as a distinct locus, Ty1 and budding yeast may have coevolved a relationship that allows high levels of transposition when Ty1 copy numbers are low and progressively less transposition as copy numbers rise. Here, we offer a perspective on p22 restriction, including its mode of expression, effect on VLP functions, interactions with its target, properties as a nucleic acid chaperone, similarities to other restriction factors, and future directions.

Indexed as

CapsidRetroelementsAnimalsGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, FungalHumansSaccharomyces cerevisiaeRetroelementsGagNucleic acid chaperoneRestriction factorRetrotransposonRNASaccharomycesVLP assembly

Identifiers

PMID26650614
PMCPMC4826814
OpenAlexW2289259207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.