ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2016
Identification of miR-139-5p as a saliva biomarker for tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Liquid Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Identification of common salivary miRNA in oral lichen planus and oral squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic Value of Salivary miRNA in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Pooled it
- MicroRNA meta-signature of oral cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2018Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Salivary Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Comparative Meta-Analysis: Salivary, Plasma, and Serum miRNA Profiles for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Detection.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Salivary MicroRNAs as Innovative Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prediction of the Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders Transition Towards Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Salivaomic Biomarkers-An Innovative Approach to the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Oral Cancer.Biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Decoding Salivary ncRNAomes as Novel Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection and Prognosis.Non-coding RNA · 2025Review
- Saliva as a Diagnostic Tool for Systemic Diseases-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Integromics profiling of oral carcinoma: exploring the role of miRNAs and circRNAs.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- Review
- Novel non-invasive molecular signatures for oral cavity cancer, by whole transcriptome and small non-coding RNA sequencing analyses: Predicted association with PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- [Advances in salivary exosomal miRNAs in head and neck squamous carcinoma].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024Review
- Salivary Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection: An Exploratory Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A novel saliva-based miRNA profile to diagnose and predict oral cancer.International journal of oral science · 2024Article
- Salivary biomarkers in non-invasive oral cancer diagnostics: a comprehensive review.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2024Review
- Comprehensive analysis of miRNA-mRNA regulatory pairs associated with colorectal cancer and the role in tumor immunity.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Salivaomics to decode non-coding RNAs in oral cancer. A narrative review.Non-coding RNA research · 2023Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOf all human oral carcinomas, 41 % are localized to the tongue. Despite considerable improvements in both diagnosis and treatment, tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) has remained one of the most lethal types of cancer. Here, we aimed at identifying a salivary microRNA (miRNA) expression signature specific for TSCC patients.
methodsTo identify putative diagnostic biomarkers, we compared the miRNA expression profiles of saliva samples from three TSCC patients and four healthy control individuals using an Agilent miRNA microarray platform (V19). Three of the differentially expressed miRNAs identified were selected for further validation using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) in saliva samples from 25 TSCC patients and 25 healthy control individuals.
resultsThrough microarray-based expression profiling, we found that 419 miRNAs were deregulated in the saliva samples from the TSCC patients compared to those from the healthy control individuals tested. Subsequent qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression level of miR-139-5p was significantly reduced in the TSCC validation samples compared to the controls. Further analysis of post-operative saliva samples derived from TSCC patients revealed that the miR-139-5p expression levels had turned back to normal again. In addition, we found that miR-139-5p exhibited enough power to discriminate pre-operative TSCC patients from both normal individuals (AUC: 0.805) and post-operative TSCC patients (AUC: 0.713), thereby underscoring its diagnostic potential.
conclusionsFrom our results we conclude that saliva can be used as a feasible source for routine TSCC diagnostics and that miR-139-5p may serve as a potential biomarker for early TSCC detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.