Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26650253›Full record

ReviewBehavioural pharmacology2016

A role for sigma receptors in stimulant self-administration and addiction.

Jonathan L Katz, Weimin C Hong, Takato Hiranita, Tsung-Ping Su

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioural pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Virtual Screening for Ligand Discovery at the σACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Glu102 mutation disrupts higher-order oligomerization of the sigma 1 receptor.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Structural basis for σNature structural & molecular biology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Novel Modafinil Analog, JJC8-016, as a Potential Cocaine Abuse Pharmacotherapeutic.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan L KatzaPsychobiology bCellular Pathobiology Sections, Intramural Research Program, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Weimin C Hong
Takato Hiranita
Tsung-Ping Su
National Institute on Drug Abuse · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Sigma Receptor and Dopamine Systems Interactions in the Effects of CocaineZIADA000547 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI KATZ, JONATHAN L · 2009 to 2016
$5.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000547NIDA NIH HHS DA000547-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sigma-1 receptors (σ1Rs) are structurally unique intracellular proteins that function as chaperones. σ1Rs translocate from the mitochondria-associated membrane to other subcellular compartments, and can influence a host of targets, including ion channels, G-protein-coupled receptors, lipids, and other signaling proteins. Drugs binding to σRs can induce or block the actions of σRs. Studies indicate that stimulant self-administration induces the reinforcing effects of σR agonists, because of dopamine transporter actions. Once established, the reinforcing effects of σR agonists are independent of dopaminergic mechanisms traditionally thought to be critical to the reinforcing effects of stimulants. Self-administered doses of σR agonists do not increase dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens shell, a transmitter and brain region considered important for the reinforcing effects of abused drugs. However, self-administration of σR agonists is blocked by σR antagonists. Several effects of stimulants have been blocked by σR antagonists, including the reinforcing effects, assessed by a place-conditioning procedure. However, the self-administration of stimulants is largely unaffected by σR antagonists, indicating fundamental differences in the mechanisms underlying these two procedures used to assess the reinforcing effects. When σR antagonists are administered in combination with dopamine uptake inhibitors, an effective and specific blockade of stimulant self-administration is obtained. Actions of stimulant drugs related to their abuse induce unique changes in σR activity and the changes induced potentially create redundant and, once established, independent reinforcement pathways. Concomitant targeting of both dopaminergic pathways and σR proteins produces a selective antagonism of stimulant self-administration, suggesting new avenues for combination chemotherapies to specifically combat stimulant abuse.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineHumansReceptors, sigmaReinforcement, PsychologySelf AdministrationSubstance-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamineReceptors, sigma

Identifiers

PMID26650253
PMCPMC4779716
OpenAlexW2333266589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.