ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016
MRI parametric monitoring of biological therapies in primary large vessel vasculitides: a pilot study.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of Takayasu arteritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- Comparison and Significance of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Findings of Large-Vessel Vasculitis Before and After Treatment: Differences Between Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis.European journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings Corresponding to Vasculitis as Defined via [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Giant Cell Arteritis: State of the Art in Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Treatment.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2023Review
- Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging enables detection of pulmonary artery lesions in Takayasu's arteritis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Outcome Measures and Biomarkers for Disease Assessment in Takayasu Arteritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Large-vessel vasculitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022Review
- Application progress of multiple imaging modalities in Takayasu arteritis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Review
- Vascular Imaging Techniques to Diagnose and Monitor Patients with Takayasu Arteritis: A Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Imaging for Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Outcome Prediction of Large Vessel Vasculitides.Current rheumatology reports · 2020Review
- Molecular imaging in large vessel vasculitis has come to stay.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: current challenges and opportunities.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2017Review
- [Management of polymyalgia rheumatica and large vessel vasculitis].Der Internist · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the development of characteristic MRI changes in patients with primary large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) when treated with biological therapies.
methods12 patients with primary LVV (8 patients with Takayasu arteritis and 4 patients with giant-cell arteritis) received biological therapy with tumour necrosis factor-α blockers (n = 9) or an interleukin-6 inhibitor (n = 3). MRI investigations were performed at baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up. All patients underwent the same MRI/MR angiography (MRA) protocol. Laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and clinical response (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score) were assessed.
resultsWall thickness was 4.2 ± 0.3 mm pre-treatment and significantly decreased to 3.2 ± 0.3 mm post treatment in 9/12 patients. Mural enhancement was increased in all 12/12 patients with LVV, and subsided with therapy in 5/12 patients. Mural oedema or ill-defined contour were less prevalent but also improved with biological treatment. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels decreased, and clinical assessment revealed a significant improvement from pre-treatment to post-treatment. However, the course of imaging characteristics often did not parallel that of laboratory or clinical parameters. In all three patients receiving interleukin-6 blockade, laboratory markers and clinical scores normalized despite persistent vascular inflammation in one patient which was disclosed by MRI.
conclusionContrast-enhanced MRI/MRA may be useful when evaluating the development of disease activity in primary LVV under biological therapies. A high degree of suspicion and regular imaging follow-up is needed to detect persistent inflammation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first study investigating the applicability of different MRI/MRA parameters for monitoring biological therapy in patients with primary LVV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.