Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649990›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

MRI parametric monitoring of biological therapies in primary large vessel vasculitides: a pilot study.

Daniel Spira, Theodoros Xenitidis, Jörg Henes, Marius Horger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Large-vessel vasculitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  9. Application progress of multiple imaging modalities in Takayasu arteritis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Spira1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Theodoros Xenitidis2 Department of Internal Medicine II, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jörg Henes2 Department of Internal Medicine II, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Marius Horger3 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the development of characteristic MRI changes in patients with primary large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) when treated with biological therapies.

methods12 patients with primary LVV (8 patients with Takayasu arteritis and 4 patients with giant-cell arteritis) received biological therapy with tumour necrosis factor-α blockers (n = 9) or an interleukin-6 inhibitor (n = 3). MRI investigations were performed at baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up. All patients underwent the same MRI/MR angiography (MRA) protocol. Laboratory parameters (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and clinical response (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score) were assessed.

resultsWall thickness was 4.2 ± 0.3 mm pre-treatment and significantly decreased to 3.2 ± 0.3 mm post treatment in 9/12 patients. Mural enhancement was increased in all 12/12 patients with LVV, and subsided with therapy in 5/12 patients. Mural oedema or ill-defined contour were less prevalent but also improved with biological treatment. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels decreased, and clinical assessment revealed a significant improvement from pre-treatment to post-treatment. However, the course of imaging characteristics often did not parallel that of laboratory or clinical parameters. In all three patients receiving interleukin-6 blockade, laboratory markers and clinical scores normalized despite persistent vascular inflammation in one patient which was disclosed by MRI.

conclusionContrast-enhanced MRI/MRA may be useful when evaluating the development of disease activity in primary LVV under biological therapies. A high degree of suspicion and regular imaging follow-up is needed to detect persistent inflammation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first study investigating the applicability of different MRI/MRA parameters for monitoring biological therapy in patients with primary LVV.

Indexed as

Interleukin-6 InhibitorsAdalimumabAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological TherapyBlood SedimentationContrast MediaC-Reactive ProteinFemaleGiant Cell ArteritisHumansInfliximabMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedAdalimumabAnti-Inflammatory AgentsContrast MediaC-Reactive ProteingadobutrolInfliximabInterleukin-6 InhibitorsOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID26649990
PMCPMC4985224
OpenAlexW2194051936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.