Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649879›Full record

Trial reportMaternal and child health journal2016

mHealth Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study in Physically Inactive Pregnant Women.

JiWon Choi, Ji Hyeon Lee, Eric Vittinghoff, Yoshimi Fukuoka

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal and child health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01461707 (A Pilot Study of a Mobile Phone-Based Physical Activity Program in Pregnant Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 26 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 26 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01461707 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study of a Mobile Phone-Based Physical Activity Program in Pregnant Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled30ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsMobile phone-based physical activity, Activity monitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 26 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

JiWon ChoiInstitute for Health and Aging/Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St., Suite 340, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA. jiwon.choi@ucsf.edu.
Ji Hyeon LeeDepartment of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Yoshimi FukuokaDepartment of Physiological Nursing/Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
UCSF Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK098722 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHRISTIAN VAISSE · 2015 to 2026
$14.6M
Applying Mobile-Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in WomenR01HL104147 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUKUOKA, YOSHIMI · 2010 to 2014
$3.7M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NHLBI NIH HHS 3R01HL104147-02S1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysical inactivity is prevalent in pregnant women, and innovative strategies to promote physical activity are strongly needed. The purpose of the study was to test a 12-week mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention for feasibility and potential efficacy.

methodsParticipants were recruited between December 2012 and February 2014 using diverse recruitment methods. Thirty pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation were randomized to an intervention (mobile phone app plus Fitbit) or a control (Fitbit) group. Both conditions targeted gradual increases in physical activity. The mHealth intervention included daily messages and a mobile phone activity diary with automated feedback and self-monitoring systems.

resultsOn monthly average, 4 women were screened for initial eligibility by telephone and 2.5 were randomized. Intervention participants had a 1096 ± 1898 step increase in daily steps compared to an increase of 259 ± 1604 steps in control participants at 12 weeks. The change between groups in weekly mean steps per day during the 12-week study period was not statistically significant (p = 0.38). The intervention group reported lower perceived barrier to being active, lack of energy, than the control group at 12-week visit (p = 0.02). The rates of responding to daily messages and using the daily diary through the mobile app declined during the 12 week study period. DISCUSSION: It was difficult to recruit and randomize inactive women who wanted to increase physical activity during pregnancy. Pregnant women who were motivated to increase physical activity might find using mobile technologies in assessing and promoting PA acceptable. Possible reasons for the non-significant treatment effect of the mHealth intervention on physical activity are discussed. Public awareness of safety and benefits of physical activity during pregnancy should be promoted. Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier NCT01461707.

Indexed as

MotivationTelemedicineText MessagingActigraphyAdultCell PhoneExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMotor ActivityPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnant PeopleSan FranciscoMobile healthPhysical activityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26649879
PMCPMC4826820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.