Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649739›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016

[Reconstructive methods after Fournier gangrene].

C Wallner, B Behr, A Ring, B D Mikhail, M Lehnhardt, A Daigeler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Complete penile skin necrosis.Turkish journal of urology · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C WallnerKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Schwerbrandverletzte, Handchirurgiezentrum, Operatives Referenzzentrum für Gliedmaßentumoren, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Deutschland. c.wallner88@gmail.com.
B BehrKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Schwerbrandverletzte, Handchirurgiezentrum, Operatives Referenzzentrum für Gliedmaßentumoren, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Deutschland.
A RingKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Schwerbrandverletzte, Handchirurgiezentrum, Operatives Referenzzentrum für Gliedmaßentumoren, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Deutschland.
B D MikhailKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Schwerbrandverletzte, Handchirurgiezentrum, Operatives Referenzzentrum für Gliedmaßentumoren, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Deutschland.
M LehnhardtKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Schwerbrandverletzte, Handchirurgiezentrum, Operatives Referenzzentrum für Gliedmaßentumoren, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Deutschland.
A DaigelerKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Schwerbrandverletzte, Handchirurgiezentrum, Operatives Referenzzentrum für Gliedmaßentumoren, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Deutschland.
BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFournier's gangrene is a variant of the necrotizing fasciitis restricted to the perineal and genital region. It presents as an acute life-threatening disease and demands rapid surgical debridement, resulting in large soft tissue defects. Various reconstructive methods have to be applied to reconstitute functionality and aesthetics. The objective of this work is to identify different reconstructive methods in the literature and compare them to our current concepts for reconstructing defects caused by Fournier gangrene.

methodsAnalysis of the current literature and our reconstructive methods on Fournier gangrene.

resultsThe Fournier gangrene is an emergency requiring rapid, calculated antibiotic treatment and radical surgical debridement. After the acute phase of the disease, appropriate reconstructive methods are indicated. The planning of the reconstruction of the defect depends on many factors, especially functional and aesthetic demands. Scrotal reconstruction requires a higher aesthetic and functional reconstructive degree than perineal cutaneous wounds. In general, thorough wound hygiene, proper pre-operative planning, and careful consideration of the patient's demands are essential for successful reconstruction.

conclusionsIn the literature, various methods for reconstruction after Fournier gangrene are described. Reconstruction with a flap is required for a good functional result in complex regions as the scrotum and penis, while cutaneous wounds can be managed through skin grafting. Patient compliance and tissue demand are crucial factors in the decision-making process.

Indexed as

Urologic Surgical ProceduresCombined Modality TherapyCritical IllnessCystoscopyDebridementDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic Techniques, UrologicalEmergenciesEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency TreatmentEvidence-Based MedicineFournier GangreneGermanyHumansMalePlastic Surgery ProceduresFasciitisFasciitis, necrotizingReconstructive surgical proceduresScrotumSoft tissue infections

Identifiers

PMID26649739
OpenAlexW2286628293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.