Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649589›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2016

Identification and Resection of Clipped Node Decreases the False-negative Rate of Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Patients Presenting With Node-positive Breast Cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) Who Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance).

Judy C Boughey, Karla V Ballman, Huong T Le-Petross, Linda M McCall, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Gretchen M Ahrendt, Lee G Wilke, Bret Taback, Eric C Feliberti, Kelly K Hunt

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 444 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judy C Boughey*Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN †Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN ‡Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Breast Imaging and Section of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX §Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC ¶Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX ||Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA **Section of Surgical Oncology, Division of General Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI ††Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY ‡‡Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.
Karla V Ballman
Huong T Le-Petross
Linda M McCall
Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Gretchen M Ahrendt
Lee G Wilke
Bret Taback
Eric C Feliberti
Kelly K Hunt
Office of the Director · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ONCOLOGY TRIALS GROUPU10CA076001 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1998 to 2013
$62.1M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
National Clinical Trials Network Research at the University of WisconsinU10CA180799 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ANDERSON, BETHANY M, KUSHNER, DAVID M · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U10 CA076001NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180799NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10CA76001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1071 trial reported a false-negative rate (FNR) of 12.6% with sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women presenting with node-positive breast cancer. One proposed method to decrease the FNR is clip placement in the positive node at initial diagnosis with confirmation of clipped node resection at surgery.

methodsZ1071 was a multi-institutional trial wherein women with clinical T0-T4,N1-N2,M0 breast cancer underwent SLN surgery and axillary dissection (ALND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In cases with a clip placed in the node, the clip location at surgery (SLN or ALND) was evaluated.

resultsA clip was placed at initial node biopsy in 203 patients. In the 170 (83.7%) patients with cN1 disease and at least 2 SLNs resected, clip location was confirmed in 141 cases. In 107 (75.9%) patients where the clipped node was within the SLN specimen, the FNR was 6.8% (confidence interval [CI]: 1.9%-16.5%). In 34 (24.1%) cases where the clipped node was in the ALND specimen, the FNR was 19.0% (CI: 5.4%-41.9%). In cases without a clip placed (n = 355) and in those where clipped node location was not confirmed at surgery (n = 29), the FNR was 13.4% and 14.3%, respectively.

conclusionsClip placement at diagnosis of node-positive disease with removal of the clipped node during SLN surgery reduces the FNR of SLN surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clip placement in the biopsy-proven node at diagnosis and evaluation of resected specimens for the clipped node should be considered when conducting SLN surgery in this setting.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionMastectomyAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAxillaBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularChemotherapy, AdjuvantFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleFiducial MarkersHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26649589
PMCPMC4777661
OpenAlexW2214028082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.