Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649580›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2016

A Propensity-matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Esophagectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemoradiation to Surgery Alone for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Jwu-Yun Hwang, Hui-Shan Chen, Po-Kuei Hsu, Yin-Kai Chao, Bing-Yen Wang, Chien-Sheng Huang, Chia-Chuan Liu, Shiao-Chi Wu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adjuvant Therapy after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?: Multi-institution Worldwide Observational Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jwu-Yun Hwang*Department of Surgery, Division of Chest Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital , Taipei, Taiwan†School of Medicine National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan‡Institute of Health and Welfare Policy, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei , Taiwan§Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan¶Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan||Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hui-Shan Chen
Po-Kuei Hsu
Yin-Kai Chao
Bing-Yen Wang
Chien-Sheng Huang
Chia-Chuan Liu
Shiao-Chi Wu
Chang Gung University · TWChanghua Christian Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of adjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer has been underestimated in the literature. This study was undertaken to determine whether adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival compared with surgery alone.

methodsData of 1095 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, including 679 in surgery alone group (group 1) and 416 in surgery followed adjuvant chemoradaition group (group 2), were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to identify 147 well-balanced patients in each group for overall survival comparison.

resultsAfter PSM, the 3-year survival rates and median survival were 44.9% and 27.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.6-40.3) months in group 2, which is significantly higher than that in group 1 (28.1% and 18.2 [95% CI: 14.3-24.5] months, P = 0.0043). In the multivariate survival analysis, pT3/4 stage (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.38-2.97, P < 0.001), pN+ stage (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.31-2.57, P = 0.0004), tumor length more than 32 mm (HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.33-2.79, P < 0.001), R1/2 resection (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.15-2.66, P = 0.009), and adjuvant chemoradiation (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78, P < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis suggested patients with pT3/4 stage, pN+ stage tumors, larger tumor size, poorly differentiated tumors, and R1/2 resections were more likely to demonstrate survival benefit from adjuvant chemoradiation.

conclusionsCompared with surgery alone, adjuvant chemoradiation provides a survival benefit to ESCC patients, especially those with pT3/4 stage, N+ tumors, larger tumor size, poorly differentiated tumors, and R1/2 resections.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantEsophagectomyAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPostoperative CarePropensity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26649580
OpenAlexW2191094400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.