ArticleThe Analyst2016
Microchip-based electrochemical detection using a 3-D printed wall-jet electrode device.
Article in The Analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanding the Toolbox of Multi-Material Three-Dimensional-Printed Electrochemical Flow Cells Fabricated in a Single Step: Impinging Jet, Mixing and Dilution, and Dual-Electrode Generator-Collector Electrochemical Cells.ACS electrochemistry · 2026Article
- Emerging Advances in Microfluidic Hydrogel Droplets for Tissue Engineering and STEM Cell Mechanobiology.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 3D-printed electrochemical platform with multi-purpose carbon black sensing electrodes.Mikrochimica acta · 2022Article
- Complementary catalysis and analysis within solid state additively manufactured metal micro flow reactors.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- 3-D printed microfluidics for rapid prototyping and testing of electrochemical, aptamer-based sensor devices under flow conditions.Analytica chimica acta · 2022Article
- Can 3D Printing Bring Droplet Microfluidics to Every Lab?-A Systematic Review.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.Journal of chromatography. A · 2021Review
- Microfluidics by Additive Manufacturing for Wearable Biosensors: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Direct embedding and versatile placement of electrodes in 3D printed microfluidic-devices.The Analyst · 2020Article
- 3D-Printed Microfluidic Device with In-line Amperometric Detection that Also Enables Multi-Modal Detection.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2020Article
- Bioelectrical Analysis of Various Cancer Cell Types Immobilized in 3D Matrix and Cultured in 3D-Printed Well.Biosensors · 2019Article
- Digital Manufacturing for Microfluidics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2019Review
- 3D Printed Microfluidic Devices for Microchip Electrophoresis of Preterm Birth Biomarkers.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- PolyJet 3D-Printed Enclosed Microfluidic Channels without Photocurable Supports.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- The Use of a 3D-Printed Microfluidic Device and Pressure Mobilization for Integrating Capillary Electrophoresis with Electrochemical Detection.Electroanalysis · 2018Article
- 3D-Printed Biosensor Arrays for Medical Diagnostics.Micromachines · 2018Review
- Use of 3D Printing and Modular Microfluidics to Integrate Cell Culture, Injections and Electrochemical Analysis.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2018Article
- 3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2016Article
- The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics.Lab on a chip · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Three dimensional (3-D) printing technology has evolved dramatically in the last few years, offering the capability of printing objects with a variety of materials. Printing microfluidic devices using this technology offers various advantages such as ease and uniformity of fabrication, file sharing between laboratories, and increased device-to-device reproducibility. One unique aspect of this technology, when used with electrochemical detection, is the ability to produce a microfluidic device as one unit while also allowing the reuse of the device and electrode for multiple analyses. Here we present an alternate electrode configuration for microfluidic devices, a wall-jet electrode (WJE) approach, created by 3-D printing. Using microchip-based flow injection analysis, we compared the WJE design with the conventionally used thin-layer electrode (TLE) design. It was found that the optimized WJE system enhances analytical performance (as compared to the TLE design), with improvements in sensitivity and the limit of detection. Experiments were conducted using two working electrodes - 500 μm platinum and 1 mm glassy carbon. Using the 500 μm platinum electrode the calibration sensitivity was 16 times higher for the WJE device (as compared to the TLE design). In addition, use of the 1 mm glassy carbon electrode led to limit of detection of 500 nM for catechol, as compared to 6 μM for the TLE device. Finally, to demonstrate the versatility and applicability of the 3-D printed WJE approach, the device was used as an inexpensive electrochemical detector for HPLC. The number of theoretical plates was comparable to the use of commercially available UV and MS detectors, with the WJE device being inexpensive to utilize. These results show that 3-D-printing can be a powerful tool to fabricate reusable and integrated microfluidic detectors in configurations that are not easily achieved with more traditional lithographic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.