Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649363›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2016

Microchip-based electrochemical detection using a 3-D printed wall-jet electrode device.

Akash S Munshi, R Scott Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Digital Manufacturing for Microfluidics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. 3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akash S MunshiDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, 3501 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. martinrs@slu.edu.
R Scott Martin
Saint Louis University · USUCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels · BE

Funding

Microchip-based Cell Reactor/Analysis SystemR15GM084470 · NIGMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, ROBERT SCOTT · 2008 to 2019
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM084470NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM084470-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three dimensional (3-D) printing technology has evolved dramatically in the last few years, offering the capability of printing objects with a variety of materials. Printing microfluidic devices using this technology offers various advantages such as ease and uniformity of fabrication, file sharing between laboratories, and increased device-to-device reproducibility. One unique aspect of this technology, when used with electrochemical detection, is the ability to produce a microfluidic device as one unit while also allowing the reuse of the device and electrode for multiple analyses. Here we present an alternate electrode configuration for microfluidic devices, a wall-jet electrode (WJE) approach, created by 3-D printing. Using microchip-based flow injection analysis, we compared the WJE design with the conventionally used thin-layer electrode (TLE) design. It was found that the optimized WJE system enhances analytical performance (as compared to the TLE design), with improvements in sensitivity and the limit of detection. Experiments were conducted using two working electrodes - 500 μm platinum and 1 mm glassy carbon. Using the 500 μm platinum electrode the calibration sensitivity was 16 times higher for the WJE device (as compared to the TLE design). In addition, use of the 1 mm glassy carbon electrode led to limit of detection of 500 nM for catechol, as compared to 6 μM for the TLE device. Finally, to demonstrate the versatility and applicability of the 3-D printed WJE approach, the device was used as an inexpensive electrochemical detector for HPLC. The number of theoretical plates was comparable to the use of commercially available UV and MS detectors, with the WJE device being inexpensive to utilize. These results show that 3-D-printing can be a powerful tool to fabricate reusable and integrated microfluidic detectors in configurations that are not easily achieved with more traditional lithographic methods.

Indexed as

ElectrodesLab-On-A-Chip DevicesPrinting, Three-DimensionalCatecholsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDopamineEpinephrineEquipment DesignLimit of DetectioncatecholCatecholsDopamineEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID26649363
PMCPMC5011427
OpenAlexW2191997473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.