Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649289›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2015

Reassessing Biological Threats: Implications for Cooperative Mitigation Strategies.

Summer Elise Galloway, Stephanie Rachel Petzing, Catharine Grace Young

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Immuno-epidemiology and pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Summer Elise GallowayDepartment of Defense, American Association for the Advancement of Science and Technology , Washington, DC , USA.
Stephanie Rachel PetzingDepartment of Defense, American Association for the Advancement of Science and Technology , Washington, DC , USA.
Catharine Grace YoungDepartment of Defense, American Association for the Advancement of Science and Technology , Washington, DC , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple factors ranging from globalization to ecosystem disruption are presenting the global community with evolving biological threats to local, national, and global security that reach beyond the realm of traditional bioweapon threats. As a result, mitigation strategies have adapted necessarily to the increased diversity of biological threats. In general, response and preparedness strategies have largely shifted from being primarily reactive to traditional biological weapons to more proactive in nature. In this review, we briefly explore biological threats through a wider aperture, to embrace a greater appreciation of viral pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, and agricultural pathogens, and their potential to cause civil, economic, and political devastation. In addition, we discuss current mitigation strategies codified by the Global Health Security Agenda and the One Health paradigm as well as some of the available tools to assist with their sustainable implementation.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebiological threatsbiosurveillanceCooperative Threat Reduction ProgramDepartment of DefenseGlobal Health Security Agendamitigation strategiesOne Health

Identifiers

PMID26649289
PMCPMC4663262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.