Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26649263›Full record

ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2015

The Unstable Distal Radius Fracture-How Do We Define It? A Systematic Review.

Monique M J Walenkamp, Lara M Vos, Simon D Strackee, J Carel Goslings, Niels W L Schep

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06631651 (The Effect of Intraoperative Brachioradialis Release on Radiological and Functional Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06631651 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Intraoperative Brachioradialis Release on Radiological and Functional Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures: Long-Term Results

TypeinterventionalSponsorHüseyin Emre TepedelenlioğluRan2019 to 2020Enrolled124ConditionsDistal Radius Fractures, Brachioradialis Release, Dresdner ScoringArmsBrachioradialis release, Brachioradialis not released
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Defining Nonunion for Metacarpal Fractures: A Systematic Review.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Perioperative management of distal radius fractures.Journal of perioperative practice · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monique M J WalenkampTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lara M VosTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Simon D StrackeeTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Carel GoslingsTrauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels W L SchepDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Unstable distal radius fractures are a popular research subject. However, to appreciate the findings of studies that enrolled patients with unstable distal radius fractures, it should be clear how the authors defined an unstable distal radius fracture. Questions In what percentage of studies involving patients with unstable distal radius fractures did the authors define unstable distal radius fracture? What are the most common descriptions of an unstable distal radius fracture? And is there one preferred evidence-based definition for future authors? Methods A systematic search of literature was performed to identify any type of study with the term unstable distal radius fracture. We assessed whether a definition was provided and determined the level of evidence for the most common definitions. Results The search yielded 2,489 citations, of which 479 were included. In 149 studies, it was explicitly stated that patients with unstable distal radius fractures were enrolled. In 54% (81/149) of these studies, the authors defined an unstable distal radius fracture. Overall, we found 143 different definitions. The seven most common definitions were: displacement following adequate reduction; Lafontaine's definition; irreducibility; an AO type C2 fracture; a volarly displaced fracture; Poigenfürst's criteria; and Cooney's criteria. Only Lafontaine's definition originated from a clinical study (level IIIb). Conclusion In only half of the studies involving patients with an unstable distal radius fracture did the authors defined what they considered an unstable distal radius fracture. None of the definitions stood out as the preferred choice. A general consensus definition could help to standardize future research.

Indexed as

definitiongeneralizabilityinstabilitysystematic reviewunstable distal radius fracture

Identifiers

PMID26649263
PMCPMC4626227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.