Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26648935›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2015

DNP-KLH Yields Changes in Leukocyte Populations and Immunoglobulin Isotype Use with Different Immunization Routes in Zebrafish.

Heather Weir, Patricia L Chen, Thaddeus C Deiss, Natalie Jacobs, Mary B Nabity, Matt Young, Michael F Criscitiello

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Loss ofOpen biology · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Fish Immunoglobulins.Biology · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather WeirComparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Science, A&M Consolidated High School , College Station, TX , USA.
Patricia L ChenComparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA.
Thaddeus C DeissComparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA.
Natalie JacobsComparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA.
Mary B NabityDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA.
Matt YoungComparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Science, A&M Consolidated High School , College Station, TX , USA.
Michael F CriscitielloComparative Immunogenetics Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA ; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX , USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinct methods are required for inducing mucosal versus systemic immunity in mammals for vaccine protection at the tissues most commonly breached by pathogens. Understanding of mucosal immunization in teleost fish is needed to combat aquaculture disease, understand emerging ecological threats, and know how vertebrate adaptive immunity evolved. Here, we quantitatively measured expression levels of IgM as well as the teleost mucosal immunoglobulin, IgZ/IgT, in zebrafish given an antigen systemically via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection or mucosally via bath immersion. Both immunoglobulin isotypes and the B cell activating factor gene transcription was induced in fish injected with antigen as compared to saline injected or antigen immersed fish, though these failed to reach statistical significance. Here we provide additional reference hematology for this model species. Differential blood counts revealed a greater lymphocyte percentage in both i.p. and immersed fish, with increase in large lymphocyte counts and decrease in neutrophils. These humoral adaptive gene transcription and cytological data should provide a foundation for more studies connecting immunology in this dominant developmental and genetic fish model to other species where mucosal immunization is of greater commercial importance.

Indexed as

BAFFIgZimmersion immunizationmucosalzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID26648935
PMCPMC4664633
OpenAlexW2182272936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.