Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26648744›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2015

Relative cost-effectiveness of using an extensively hydrolyzed casein formula containing the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in managing infants with cow's milk allergy in Spain.

Julian F Guest, Diana Weidlich, J Ignacio Mascuñan Díaz, Juan J Díaz, Pedro Manuel Ojeda, J Pablo Ferrer-González, David Gil, Isabel Onrubia, Pedro Rincón Victor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julian F GuestCatalyst Health Economics Consultants, Northwood, Middlesex, UK ; Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College, London, UK.
Diana WeidlichCatalyst Health Economics Consultants, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
J Ignacio Mascuñan DíazCentro de Salud de Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Juan J DíazHospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Pedro Manuel OjedaClínica de Asma y Alergia Doctores Ojeda, Valencia, Spain.
J Pablo Ferrer-GonzálezHospital General de Requena, Valencia, Spain.
David GilHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Isabel OnrubiaCentro de Salud Valle de la Oliva, Majadahonda, Spain.
Pedro Rincón VictorCentro de Salud la Chopera, Alcobendas, Spain.
Catalyst Health Economics Consultants Ltd · GBClínica Subiza · ESHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of using an extensively hydrolyzed casein formula containing the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (eHCF + LGG; Nutramigen LGG) as a first-line management for cow's milk allergy compared with eHCF alone, and amino acid formulae in Spain, from the perspective of the Spanish National Health Service (SNS).

methodsDecision modeling was used to estimate the probability of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated and non-IgE-mediated allergic infants developing tolerance to cow's milk by 18 months. The models also estimated the SNS cost (at 2012/2013 prices) of managing infants over 18 months after starting a formula as well as the relative cost-effectiveness of each of the formulae.

resultsThe probability of developing tolerance to cow's milk by 18 months was higher among infants with either IgE-mediated or non-IgE-mediated allergy who were fed eHCF + LGG compared with those fed one of the other formulae. The total health care cost of initially feeding infants with eHCF + LGG was less than that of feeding infants with one of the other formulae. Hence, eHCF + LGG affords the greatest value for money to the SNS for managing both IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy.

conclusionUsing eHCF + LGG instead of eHCF alone or amino acid formulae for first-line management of newly-diagnosed infants with cow's milk allergy affords a cost-effective use of publicly funded resources because it improves outcome for less cost. A randomized controlled study showing faster tolerance development in children receiving a probiotic-containing formula is required before this conclusion can be confirmed.

Indexed as

amino acid formulacost-effectivenesscow’s milk allergyextensively hydrolyzed formulaLactobacillus rhamnosus GGSpain

Identifiers

PMID26648744
PMCPMC4664436
OpenAlexW4250105059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.