Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26648736›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2015

Incidence and clinical significance of ESR1 mutations in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

Jiaxin Niu, Grant Andres, Kim Kramer, Madappa N Kundranda, Ricardo H Alvarez, Eiko Klimant, Ankur R Parikh, Bradford Tan, Edgar D Staren, Maurie Markman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. ESR1 hotspot mutations in endometrial stromal sarcoma with high-grade transformation and endocrine treatment.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  13. Gene-environment interaction identification via penalized robust divergence.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Currently Applied Molecular Assays for IdentifyingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiaxin NiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Western Regional Medical Center at Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA), Goodyear, AZ, USA.
Grant AndresDepartment of Medical Oncology, Western Regional Medical Center at Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA), Goodyear, AZ, USA.
Kim KramerCTCA Medicine and Science, Zion, IL, USA.
Madappa N KundrandaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA.
Ricardo H AlvarezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Southeastern Regional Medical Center at CTCA, Newnan, GA, USA.
Eiko KlimantDepartment of Medical Oncology, Eastern Regional Medical Center at CTCA, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ankur R ParikhDepartment of Medical Oncology, Eastern Regional Medical Center at CTCA, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bradford TanDepartment of Pathology, Midwestern Regional Medical Center at CTCA, Zion, IL, USA.
Edgar D StarenAdvanced Individual Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Maurie MarkmanCTCA Medicine and Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundESR1 mutation has recently emerged as one of the important mechanisms involved in endocrine resistance. The incidence and clinical implication of ESR1 mutation has not been well evaluated in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of advanced breast cancer patients with tumors who underwent next-generation sequencing genomic profiling using Foundation One test at Cancer Treatment Centers of America(®) regional hospitals between November 2012 and November 2014.

resultsWe identified a total of 341 patients including 217 (59%) estrogen receptor (ER)+, 177 (48%) progesterone receptor (PR)+, 30 (8%) hormone receptor+/HER2 positive, and 119 (32%) triple negative patients. ESR1 mutation was noted in 27/222 (12.1%) ER+ or PR+ breast cancer patients. All ER+ patients received at least one line of an aromatase inhibitor. All 28 patients were found to harbor ESR1 mutations affecting ligand-binding domain with the most common mutations affecting Y537 (17/28, 60.7%) and D538 (9/28, 32.1%). In this cohort, 19 (67.9%) patients carried three or more, seven (25%) patients had one or two additional genomic alterations and one (3.6%) patient had an ESR1 mutation only. Of 28 patients, three patients were treated with fulvestrant immediately before and two patients were treated after next-generation sequencing testing; only one patient achieved stable disease for 8 months and the other four patients had progression of disease. In all, 3/3 (100%) patients before testing and 2/4 (50%) after testing treated with exemestane and everolimus achieved stable disease for at least 6 months.

conclusionESR1 mutation was found in 12.1% of a large cohort of advanced breast cancer patients. Exemestane in combination with everolimus might be a reasonable option. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Indexed as

breast cancerendocrine therapyESR1 mutationgenomic alterationnext-generation sequencingresistance

Identifiers

PMID26648736
PMCPMC4648593
OpenAlexW2097221352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.