Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26648711›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015

Applying the wisdom of stepping down inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD: a proposed algorithm for clinical practice.

Alan G Kaplan

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Discontinuation Schedule of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients: rationale and algorithms.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Increased urinary l-histidine in patients with asthma-COPD overlap: a pilot study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  17. Overuse of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: five questions for withdrawal in daily practice.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Inhaled therapies in patients with moderate COPD in clinical practice: current thinking.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan G KaplanFamily Physician Airways Group of Canada, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
TD Bank Group · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend limiting the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to patients with more severe disease and/or increased exacerbation risk. However, there are discrepancies between guidelines and real-life practice, as ICS are being overprescribed. In light of the increasing concerns about the clinical benefit and long-term risks associated with ICS use, therapy needs to be carefully weighed on a case-by-case basis, including in patients already on ICS. Several studies sought out to determine the effects of withdrawing ICS in patients with COPD. Early studies have deterred clinicians from reducing ICS in patients with COPD as they reported that an abrupt withdrawal of ICS precipitates exacerbations, and results in a deterioration in lung function and symptoms. However, these studies were fraught with numerous methodological limitations. Recently, two randomized controlled trials and a real-life prospective study revealed that ICS can be safely withdrawn in certain patients. Of these, the WISDOM (Withdrawal of Inhaled Steroids During Optimized Bronchodilator Management) trial was the largest and first to examine stepwise withdrawal of ICS in patients with COPD receiving maintenance therapy of long-acting bronchodilators (ie, tiotropium and salmeterol). Even with therapy being in line with the current guidelines, the findings of the WISDOM trial indicate that not all patients benefit from including ICS in their treatment regimen. Indeed, only certain COPD phenotypes seem to benefit from ICS therapy, and validated markers that predict ICS response are urgently warranted in clinical practice. Furthermore, we are now better equipped with a larger armamentarium of novel and more effective long-acting β2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist combinations that can be considered by clinicians to optimize bronchodilation and allow for safer ICS withdrawal. In addition to providing a review of the aforementioned, this perspective article proposes an algorithm for the stepwise withdrawal of ICS in real-life clinical practice.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCritical PathwaysAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchodilator AgentsDisease ProgressionDrug Therapy, CombinationGuideline AdherenceHumansInappropriate PrescribingLungMedical OverusePatient SelectionPhenotypePractice Guidelines as TopicAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchodilator Agentsalgorithmbronchodilationchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseclinical practiceinhaled corticosteroidwithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID26648711
PMCPMC4664433
OpenAlexW2179065489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.