Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26648230›Full record

ArticleCrisis2015

Suicidal Ideation of Probationers. Gender Differences.

Sung-Suk Violet Yu, Hung-En Sung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crisis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Food Access, Dietary Intake, and Nutrition Knowledge of Adults on Probation.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Suicide and Probation: a systematic review of the literature.Forensic science international. Mind and law · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Secular trends in suicidal ideation and associated factors among adolescents.Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sung-Suk Violet Yu1 Department of Criminal Justice, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA.
Hung-En Sung1 Department of Criminal Justice, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender is often related to different life stressors and mental health disorders, but a limited amount of research examines risks of suicidal ideation of probationers by gender.

aimsThe aim of this study was to examine gender differences in suicidal ideation of probationers.

methodUsing a national sample of 3,014 male and 1,306 female probationers with data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2009-2011), multivariate regression analysis was conducted.

resultsMale and female probationers display similar demographic characteristics although their life circumstances and experiences seem different. Female probationers in the study were more likely to experience financial, psychological, and residential stressors than male probationers were. Female probationers were also more likely to have received medical and/or psychiatric treatments. Female probationers were exposed to more suicidal ideation risks than male probationers were. Additionally, no protective factors to suicidal ideation were found for female probationers.

conclusionThe findings suggest that a gender-specific approach to suicidal ideation of probationers may lessen the prevalence of suicidal ideation of this largely neglected population.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationAdultCriminalsEmploymentFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth SurveysHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPovertyPrevalencegender-specificprobationsuicidal ideationthe Affordable Care Act

Identifiers

PMID26648230
PMCPMC4673689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.