Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26648140›Full record

ArticleDevelopment and psychopathology2016

The cognitive developmental profile associated with fragile X syndrome: A longitudinal investigation of cognitive strengths and weaknesses through childhood and adolescence.

Eve-Marie Quintin, Booil Jo, Scott S Hall, Jennifer L Bruno, Lindsay C Chromik, Mira M Raman, Amy A Lightbody, Arianna Martin, Allan L Reiss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development and psychopathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Developmental studies in fragile X syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Longitudinal identification of clinically distinct neurophenotypes in young children with fragile X syndrome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eve-Marie QuintinMcGill University.
Booil JoStanford University.
Scott S HallStanford University.
Jennifer L BrunoStanford University.
Lindsay C ChromikStanford University.
Mira M RamanStanford University.
Amy A LightbodyStanford University.
Arianna MartinStanford University.
Allan L ReissStanford University.
Stanford University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

NEUROPSYCHIATRIC-MOLECULAR ASSOCIATIONS IN FRAGILE X SYNR01MH050047 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1993 to 2022
$12.5M
Longitudinal MRI Study of Brain Development in Fragile XR01MH064708 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PIVEN, JOSEPH, REISS, ALLAN L · 2002 to 2016
$8.1M
TRAINING FOR CHILD PSYCHIATRY AND CHILD DEVELOPMENTT32MH019908 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB, DAVID S HONG · 1993 to 2026
$6.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050047NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064708NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have investigated developmental strengths and weaknesses within the cognitive profile of children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome (FXS), a single-gene cause of inherited intellectual impairment. With a prospective longitudinal design and using normalized raw scores (Z scores) to circumvent floor effects, we measured cognitive functioning of 184 children and adolescents with FXS (ages 6 to 16) using the Wechsler Scale of Intelligence for Children on one to three occasions for each participant. Participants with FXS received lower raw scores relative to the Wechsler Scale of Intelligence for Children normative sample across the developmental period. Verbal comprehension, perceptual organization, and processing speed Z scores were marked by a widening gap from the normative sample, while freedom from distractibility Z scores showed a narrowing gap. Key findings include a relative strength for verbal skills in comparison with visuospatial-constructive skills arising in adolescence and a discrepancy between working memory (weakness) and processing speed (strength) in childhood that diminishes in adolescence. Results suggest that the cognitive profile associated with FXS develops dynamically from childhood to adolescence. Findings are discussed within the context of aberrant brain morphology in childhood and maturation in adolescence. We argue that assessing disorder-specific cognitive developmental profiles will benefit future disorder-specific treatment research.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentChildChild DevelopmentCognitionCognition DisordersComprehensionFemaleFragile X SyndromeHumansIntelligenceMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesWechsler Scales

Identifiers

PMID26648140
PMCPMC4900941
OpenAlexW2192476609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.