Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26647849›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2016

Intrusive memories to traumatic footage: the neural basis of their encoding and involuntary recall.

I A Clark, E A Holmes, M W Woolrich, C E Mackay

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Witnessing Trauma in the Modern Era: The Role of Uncensored Media in Mental Health.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Prefrontal and Cerebellar Contributions to Semantic Memory Retrieval.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

I A ClarkDepartment of Psychiatry,University of Oxford,Warneford Hospital,Oxford OX3 7NG,UK.
E A HolmesMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit,15 Chaucer Road,Cambridge CB2 7EF,UK.
M W WoolrichDepartment of Psychiatry,Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA),Warneford Hospital,Oxford OX3 7NG,UK.
C E MackayDepartment of Psychiatry,University of Oxford,Warneford Hospital,Oxford OX3 7NG,UK.
University of Oxford · GBMedical Research Council · GBWarneford Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MCA060-5PR50Medical Research Council MC_UP_0901/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT088217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA hallmark symptom after psychological trauma is the presence of intrusive memories. It is unclear why only some moments of trauma become intrusive, and how these memories involuntarily return to mind. Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in the encoding and involuntary recall of intrusive memories may elucidate these questions.

methodParticipants (n = 35) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while being exposed to traumatic film footage. After film viewing, participants indicated within the scanner, while undergoing fMRI, if they experienced an intrusive memory of the film. Further intrusive memories in daily life were recorded for 7 days. After 7 days, participants completed a recognition memory test. Intrusive memory encoding was captured by comparing activity at the time of viewing 'Intrusive scenes' (scenes recalled involuntarily), 'Control scenes' (scenes never recalled involuntarily) and 'Potential scenes' (scenes recalled involuntarily by others but not that individual). Signal change associated with intrusive memory involuntary recall was modelled using finite impulse response basis functions.

resultsWe found a widespread pattern of increased activation for Intrusive v. both Potential and Control scenes at encoding. The left inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus showed increased activity in Intrusive scenes compared with Potential scenes, but not in Intrusive scenes compared with Control scenes. This pattern of activation persisted when taking recognition memory performance into account. Intrusive memory involuntary recall was characterized by activity in frontal regions, notably the left inferior frontal gyrus.

conclusionsThe left inferior frontal gyrus may be implicated in both the encoding and involuntary recall of intrusive memories.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicMental RecallAdolescentAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexPsychological TraumaStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTemporal LobeUnited KingdomYoung AdultDorsolateral prefrontal cortexflashbacksfunctional magnetic resonance imagingintrusive memoriesleft inferior frontal gyrus

Identifiers

PMID26647849
PMCPMC4697303
OpenAlexW2193841008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.