Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26647750›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy

Kinesio Taping® is not better than placebo in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Maurício A Luz Júnior, Manoel V Sousa, Luciana A F S Neves, Aline A C Cezar, Leonardo O P Costa

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02812459 nacompletednot on this map

Short-term Effectiveness of Additional Electrical Stimulation to Exercise Versus Kinesio Taping in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de GranadaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled62ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsKinesio taping, Electrical Stimulation
NCT05200689 naunknown statusnot on this map

Post-Operative Kinesio Taping Impact on Pain in Thoracotomy vs Thoracoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAl-Quds UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled310ConditionsPost Operative PainArmsKinesiotaping (KT)
NCT05866159 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Kinesio Tape on Back-Specific Body Perception, Pain, Functional Status, and Physical Activity Level in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorKutahya Health Sciences UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsLow Back PainArmsKinesiotape using Rocktape®, Sham taping
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Is Kinesio Taping to Generate Skin Convolutions Effective for Increasing Local Blood Circulation?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Women with Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comment on "Linfotaping with Kinesio® Tape to manage and treat lymphedema patients: safety and tolerability are more important than efficacy".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maurício A Luz JúniorDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Manoel V SousaDepartamento de Fisioterapia, UNIP, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil.
Luciana A F S NevesDepartamento de Fisioterapia, UNIP, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil.
Aline A C CezarDepartamento de Fisioterapia, UNIP, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo O P CostaUniversidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí · BRThe George Institute for Global Health · AUUniversidade Paulista · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKinesio Taping® has been widely used in clinical practice. However, it is unknown whether this type of tape is more effective than placebo taping in patients with chronic lower back pain.

objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping® in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain against a placebo tape and a control group.

methodThis is a 3-arm, randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor. Sixty patients with chronic non-specific low back pain were randomized into one of the three groups: Kinesio Taping® group (n=20), Micropore® (placebo) group (n=20) and control group (n=20). Patients allocated to both the Kinesio Taping® group and the placebo group used the different types of tape for a period of 48 hours. The control group did not receive any intervention. The outcomes measured were pain intensity (measured by an 11-point numerical rating scale) and disability (measured by the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). A blinded assessor measured the outcomes at baseline, 48 hours and 7 days after randomization.

resultsAfter 48 hours, there was a statistically significant difference between the Kinesio Taping® group versus the control group (mean between-group difference = -3.1 points, 95% CI=-5.2 to -1.1, p=0.003), but no difference when compared to the placebo group (mean between-group difference= 1.9 points, 95% CI=-0.2 to 3.9, p=0.08). For the other outcomes no differences were observed.

conclusionsThe Kinesio Taping® is not better than placebo (Micropore®) in patients with chronic low back pain.

Indexed as

Athletic TapeLow Back PainHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID26647750
PMCPMC4668342
OpenAlexW2176633001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.