Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26647020›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2016

Repeatability of (31) P MRSI in the human brain at 7 T with and without the nuclear Overhauser effect.

Miriam W Lagemaat, Bart L van de Bank, Pascal Sati, Shizhe Li, Marnix C Maas, Tom W J Scheenen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Test-retest precision of brain metabolites in healthy participants usingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. NMR in biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Sex and menopause impactScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. 3DNMR in biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  9. SNR optimizedNMR in biomedicine · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Phosphodiester content measured in human liver by in vivoMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Miriam W LagemaatDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Bart L van de BankDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Pascal SatiLaboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shizhe LiMRS Core Facility, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marnix C MaasDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Tom W J ScheenenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging · DENational Institute of Mental Health · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

European Research Council 243115Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An often-employed strategy to enhance signals in (31) P MRS is the generation of the nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) by saturation of the water resonance. However, NOE allegedly increases the variability of the (31) P data, because variation is reported in NOE enhancements. This would negate the signal-to-noise (SNR) gain it generates. We hypothesized that the variation in NOE enhancement values is not caused by the variability in NOE itself, but is attributable to measurement uncertainties in the values used to calculate the enhancement. If true, the expected increase in SNR with NOE would improve the repeatability of (31) P MRS measurements. To verify this hypothesis, a repeatability study of native and NOE-enhanced (31) P MRSI was performed in the brains of seven healthy volunteers at 7 T. The repeatability coefficient (RC) and the coefficient of variation in repeated measurements (CoVrepeat ) were determined for each method, and the 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) between native and NOE-enhanced signals were calculated. The variation between the methods, defined by the LoA, is at least as great as that predicted by the RC of each method. The sources of variation in NOE enhancements were determined using variance component analysis. In the seven metabolites with a positive NOE enhancement (nine metabolite resonances assessed), CoVrepeat improved, on average, by 15%. The LoAs could be explained by the RCs of the individual methods for the majority of the metabolites, generally confirming our hypothesis. Variation in NOE enhancement was mainly attributable to the factor repeat, but between-voxel effects were also present for phosphoethanolamine and (glycero)phosphocholine. CoVrepeat and fitting error were strongly correlated and improved with positive NOE. Our findings generally indicate that NOE enhances the signal of metabolites, improving the repeatability of metabolite measurements. Additional variability as a result of NOE was minimal. These findings encourage the use of NOE-enhanced (31) P MRSI. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMetabolomePhosphorusReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultPhosphorus7 TMRSrepeatabilityreproducibilityultrahigh field

Identifiers

PMID26647020
PMCPMC4769102
OpenAlexW2292010776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.