Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26646844›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2016

Development and initial evaluation of a point-of-care educational app on medical topics in orthogeriatrics.

Katrin Singler, Tobias Roth, Sacha Beck, Michael Cunningham, Markus Gosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Usage of smart devices amongst medical practitioners in Universitas Academic Hospital.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katrin SinglerDepartment of Geriatrics, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany.
Tobias RothDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sacha BeckDepartment of Geriatrics, Stadtspital Waid, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael CunninghamAO Education Institute, AO Foundation, Dübendorf, Switzerland. michael.cunningham@aofoundation.org.
Markus GoschDepartment of Geriatrics, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch by AOTrauma's orthogeriatrics education taskforce identified ongoing educational needs for surgeons and trainees worldwide regarding the medical management of older adults with a fracture. To address practicing surgeons' preference for increased use of mobile learning, a point-of-care educational app was planned by a committee of experienced faculty. The goals were to deliver the app to surgeons, trainees, and other healthcare professionals, to measure usage, and to evaluate the impact on patient care. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe committee of geriatricians and surgeons designed and developed four modules on osteoporosis, delirium, anticoagulation, and pain based on published evidence and the content was programmed into mobile app formats. A registration form was integrated and a 14-question online evaluation survey was administered to users.

resultsThe AOTrauma Orthogeriatrics app was installed by 17,839 users worldwide between September 2014 and October 2015: Android smartphones (44%), iPhones (32%), iPads (15%), Android tablets (9%). 920 users registered and 100 completed the online evaluation: orthopedic/trauma surgeons (67%), residents/fellows (20%), and other professionals (13%). Ratings for all aspects were 4 or higher on a 1-5 Likert scale (5 = Excellent). 80% of evaluation respondents found the answer to their question or educational need on their last visit, and 26 of 55 respondents (47%) reported making a change in an aspect of their management of patients as a result of their learning from the app.

conclusionThe orthogeriatrics app reached its intended audiences and was rated highly as a method of providing education to help improve patient care. Content input by experienced faculty and app improvements based on user feedback were key contributors to successful implementation.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedMobile ApplicationsPoint-of-Care SystemsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingFemaleGeriatricsGlobal HealthHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedicsProspective StudiesAnticoagulationDeliriumEducationFragility fracturesOlder adultsOrthogeriatricsOsteoporosisPerioperative pain

Identifiers

PMID26646844
PMCPMC4706575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.