Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26646837›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2016

Sugammadex and rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis.

Tomonori Takazawa, Hiromasa Mitsuhata, Paul Michel Mertes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07044180 (Reversal of Pipecuronium-induced Neuromuscular Blockade With Sugammadex During Propofol Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07044180 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Reversal of Pipecuronium-induced Neuromuscular Blockade With Sugammadex During Propofol Anesthesia: a Drug Safety Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTamas Vegh, MDRan2025 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsNeuromuscular Blocking Agents, Residual Neuromuscular Block, Reversal of Neuromuscular BlockadeArmspipecuronium bromide, Rocuronium bromide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Allergic Reactions to Sugammadex: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomonori TakazawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan. takazawt@gunma-u.ac.jp.
Hiromasa MitsuhataDepartment of Anesthesiology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, 3-3-20 Shinsuna, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 136-0075, Japan.
Paul Michel MertesService d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, Nouvel hôpital civil, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, BP 426, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Gunma University · JPHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRKoto Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perioperative anaphylaxis is a life-threatening clinical condition that is typically the result of drugs or substances used for anesthesia or surgery. The most common cause of anaphylaxis during anesthesia is reportedly neuromuscular blocking agents. Of the many muscle relaxants that are clinically available, rocuronium is becoming popular in many countries. Recent studies have demonstrated that succinylcholine (but also rocuronium use) is associated with a relatively high rate of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis compared with other muscle relaxant agents. Sugammadex is widely used for reversal of the effects of steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents, such as rocuronium and vecuronium. Confirmed cases of allergic reactions to clinical doses of sugammadex have also been recently reported. Given these circumstances, the number of cases of hypersensitivity to either sugammadex or rocuronium is likely to increase. Thus, anesthesiologists should be familiar with the epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical presentations of anaphylaxis induced by these drugs. In this review, we focus on the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis to sugammadex and neuromuscular blocking agents. Moreover, we discuss recent studies in this field, including the diagnostic utility of flow cytometry and improvement of rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis with the use of sugammadex.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisAndrostanolsAnesthesiagamma-CyclodextrinsHumansNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRocuroniumSuccinylcholineSugammadexVecuronium BromideAndrostanolsgamma-CyclodextrinsNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRocuroniumSuccinylcholineSugammadexVecuronium BromideAnaphylaxisFlow cytometryNeuromuscular blocking agentRocuroniumSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID26646837
PMCPMC4819478
OpenAlexW2191448274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.