Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26646820›Full record

ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2016

The ROOTS study: a 10-year review of findings on adolescent depression, and recommendations for future longitudinal research.

Gemma Lewis, Peter B Jones, Ian M Goodyer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mental Health and Wellbeing in Young People in the UK during Lockdown (COVID-19).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Participants Attrition in a Longitudinal Study: The Malaysian Cohort Study Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Poor family functioning mediates the link between childhood adversity and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel methods in psychiatric epidemiology.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gemma LewisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18b Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK. gl396@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Box 189, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Ian M GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Douglas House, 18b Trumpington Road, Cambridge, CB2 8AH, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 074296Wellcome Trust 093875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to review longitudinal findings on adolescent mental health from the 'ROOTS study', and provide directions and recommendations for future longitudinal research. To do this, we discuss relevant findings from the ROOTS study, and review its strengths and limitations.

methodsWe examined all publications from the ROOTS study up to July 2015, selected those examining adolescent mental health, and classified them as investigating (a) childhood risk factors for adolescent depression, (b) genetic and cognitive vulnerability to depression in adolescence, (c) genetic markers, childhood adversities, and neuroendophenotypes, (d) morning cortisol and depression, (e) physical activity and depression symptoms, and (f) the underlying structure of mental health in adolescence. We reviewed the strengths and limitations of the ROOTS study, and how they feed into recommendations for future longitudinal research.

resultsThere was evidence supporting a putative hormonal biomarker for the emergence of depression in boys. Environmental pathways from child adversity to adolescent depression were confirmed in girls, partly accounted for by negative life events in early adolescence. The preceding role of automatic cognitive biases assessed using behavioural tasks was substantiated, with evidence for genetic susceptibility. Novel latent statistical models of child adversity, depression, anxiety, and psychotic experiences were produced, with concurrent and prospective validity. Our experiences conducting the ROOTS study resulted in a set of strengths, limitations, and recommendations for future longitudinal studies.

conclusionsThe ROOTS study has advanced knowledge on the aetiology of adolescent depression by investigating environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neural risk factors. Findings provide a foundation for future research integrating cognitive neuroscience with epidemiology.

Indexed as

AdolescentDepressionForecastingHumansLongitudinal StudiesResearchRisk FactorsAdolescenceDepressionLongitudinalNeuroscienceROOTS

Identifiers

PMID26646820
PMCPMC4748011
OpenAlexW2210259274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.