Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26646759›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

Afatinib beyond progression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer following chemotherapy, erlotinib/gefitinib and afatinib: phase III randomized LUX-Lung 5 trial.

M Schuler, J C-H Yang, K Park, J-H Kim, J Bennouna, Y-M Chen, C Chouaid, F De Marinis, J-F Feng, F Grossi and 11 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01085136 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Randomized Trial of BIBW 2992 Plus Weekly Paclitaxel Versus Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy Following BIBW 2992 Monotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Failing Previous Erlotinib or Gefitinib Treatment (LUX Lung 5)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2010 to 2016Enrolled1,154ConditionsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungArmsInvestigator´s choice of chemotherapy, BIBW 2992
NCT06759857 phase3enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Open, Positives Parallel-controlled, Multicenter Phase III to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FHND9041 Versus Afatinib in First-line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorJiangsu Chia Tai Fenghai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2021 to 2025Enrolled350ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung CancerArmsFHND9041, Afatinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prolonged Response to Afatinib and Crizotinib in a Rare Case ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

M SchulerWest German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen German Cancer Research Center, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany martin.schuler@uk-essen.de.
J C-H YangDepartment of Medical Research, National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
K ParkSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul.
J-H KimYonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J BennounaOncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France.
Y-M ChenTaipei Cancer Center, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
C ChouaidServices de Pneumologie, CHI Créteil, Créteil, France.
F De Marinis1st Oncological Pulmonary Unit, San Camillo, High Specialization Hospital, Rome Thoracic Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
J-F FengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Province Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China.
F GrossiIRCCS AOU San Martino IST, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy.
D-W KimLung Cancer, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
X LiuDepartment of Pulmonary Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing.
S LuShanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
J StrauszDepartment of Pulmonology, Koranyi National Institute for Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Y VinnykAbdominal Department, Kharkiv Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
R WiewrodtDepartment of Medicine A, University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
C ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China.
B WangBiostatistics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield.
V K ChandClinical Development Medical Affairs-Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, USA.
D PlanchardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
LUX-Lung 5 Investigators
Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USSeoul National University Hospital · KRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWTongji University · CNAcademy of Military Medical Sciences · CNHôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRJiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNOrszágos Korányi Tbc és Pulmonológiai Intézet · HUShanghai Chest Hospital · CNSungkyunkwan University · KRTaipei Medical University · TWUniversity Hospital Münster · DEAlleanza Contro il Cancro · ITDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfatinib has demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after treatment with erlotinib/gefitinib. This phase III trial prospectively assessed whether continued irreversible ErbB-family blockade with afatinib plus paclitaxel has superior outcomes versus switching to chemotherapy alone in patients acquiring resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib and afatinib monotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with relapsed/refractory disease following ≥1 line of chemotherapy, and whose tumors had progressed following initial disease control (≥12 weeks) with erlotinib/gefitinib and thereafter afatinib (50 mg/day), were randomized 2:1 to receive afatinib plus paclitaxel (40 mg/day; 80 mg/m(2)/week) or investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety and patient-reported outcomes.

resultsTwo hundred and two patients with progressive disease following clinical benefit from afatinib were randomized to afatinib plus paclitaxel (n = 134) or single-agent chemotherapy (n = 68). PFS (median 5.6 versus 2.8 months, hazard ratio 0.60, P = 0.003) and ORR (32.1% versus 13.2%, P = 0.005) significantly improved with afatinib plus paclitaxel. There was no difference in OS. Global health status/quality of life was maintained with afatinib plus paclitaxel over the entire treatment period. The median treatment duration was 133 and 51 days with afatinib plus paclitaxel and single-agent chemotherapy, respectively; 48.5% of patients receiving afatinib plus paclitaxel and 30.0% of patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy experienced drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with those previously reported with each agent.

conclusionAfatinib plus paclitaxel improved PFS and ORR compared with single-agent chemotherapy in patients who acquired resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib and progressed on afatinib after initial benefit. LUX-Lung 5 is the first prospective trial to demonstrate the benefit of continued ErbB targeting post-progression, versus switching to single-agent chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01085136 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

AfatinibAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGefitinibHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelProspective StudiesAfatinibAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideGefitinibPaclitaxelProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesafatinibNSCLCpaclitaxelsquamous cell

Identifiers

PMID26646759
PMCPMC4769992
OpenAlexW2232632307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.