Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016
Afatinib beyond progression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer following chemotherapy, erlotinib/gefitinib and afatinib: phase III randomized LUX-Lung 5 trial.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase III Randomized Trial of BIBW 2992 Plus Weekly Paclitaxel Versus Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy Following BIBW 2992 Monotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Failing Previous Erlotinib or Gefitinib Treatment (LUX Lung 5)
A Randomized, Open, Positives Parallel-controlled, Multicenter Phase III to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FHND9041 Versus Afatinib in First-line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- A network meta-analysis of immunotherapy-based treatments for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Pooled it
- Treatment beyond progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of overall incidence and risk of ALK inhibitors-induced liver toxicities in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- A phase II trial of anlotinib plus EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with gradual, oligo, or potential progression after EGFR-TKIs treatment (CTONG-1803/ALTER-L001).Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Trial
- Immune killer cells treatment for previously treated stage IV NSCLC patients.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017Trial
- Application of Zizao Yangrong Granules for Treating Targeted Drugs-Related Skin Xerosis: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study.Integrative cancer therapiesTrial
- Validation of the cancer-specific utility measure EORTC QLU-C10D using evidence from four lung cancer trials covering six country value sets.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cancer-Specific Health Utilities: Evaluation of Core Measurement Properties of the EORTC QLU-C10D in Lung Cancer Patients-Data from Four Multicentre LUX-Lung Trials, Applying Six Country Tariffs.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Article
- Prolonged Response to Afatinib and Crizotinib in a Rare Case ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing cancer care strategies: immunotherapy, gene therapy, and molecular targeted therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2024Review
- The benefit of treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical Relevance of Targeted Therapy and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition in Lung Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Structure-Guided Strategies of Targeted Therapies for Patients withBiomolecules · 2023Review
- Review
- Design, Synthesis, Anticancer Activity and Molecular Docking of New 1,2,3-Triazole-Based Glycosides Bearing 1,3,4-Thiadiazolyl, Indolyl and Arylacetamide Scaffolds.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor in paclitaxel-resistant human breast and lung cancer cells with upregulated glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- The Therapeutic Potential of the Restoration of the p53 Protein Family Members in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Elevated expression of miR-494-3p is associated with resistance to osimertinib in EGFR T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2022Article
- Study on the Evaluation of Lung Cancer Patients from the Three Aspects of Emotion.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAfatinib has demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer progressing after treatment with erlotinib/gefitinib. This phase III trial prospectively assessed whether continued irreversible ErbB-family blockade with afatinib plus paclitaxel has superior outcomes versus switching to chemotherapy alone in patients acquiring resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib and afatinib monotherapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with relapsed/refractory disease following ≥1 line of chemotherapy, and whose tumors had progressed following initial disease control (≥12 weeks) with erlotinib/gefitinib and thereafter afatinib (50 mg/day), were randomized 2:1 to receive afatinib plus paclitaxel (40 mg/day; 80 mg/m(2)/week) or investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety and patient-reported outcomes.
resultsTwo hundred and two patients with progressive disease following clinical benefit from afatinib were randomized to afatinib plus paclitaxel (n = 134) or single-agent chemotherapy (n = 68). PFS (median 5.6 versus 2.8 months, hazard ratio 0.60, P = 0.003) and ORR (32.1% versus 13.2%, P = 0.005) significantly improved with afatinib plus paclitaxel. There was no difference in OS. Global health status/quality of life was maintained with afatinib plus paclitaxel over the entire treatment period. The median treatment duration was 133 and 51 days with afatinib plus paclitaxel and single-agent chemotherapy, respectively; 48.5% of patients receiving afatinib plus paclitaxel and 30.0% of patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy experienced drug-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with those previously reported with each agent.
conclusionAfatinib plus paclitaxel improved PFS and ORR compared with single-agent chemotherapy in patients who acquired resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib and progressed on afatinib after initial benefit. LUX-Lung 5 is the first prospective trial to demonstrate the benefit of continued ErbB targeting post-progression, versus switching to single-agent chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01085136 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.