Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26646496›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2015

Can aging be 'drugged'?

Celine E Riera, Andrew Dillin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Are We Ill Because We Age?Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Can We Learn About Human Disease from the Nematode C. elegans?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
  20. The role of epigenetics in renal ageing.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celine E RieraDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Andrew DillinDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The engines that drive the complex process of aging are being identified by model-organism research, thereby providing potential targets and rationale for drug studies. Several studies of small molecules have already been completed in animal models with the hope of finding an elixir for aging, with a few compounds showing early promise. What lessons can we learn from drugs currently being tested, and which pitfalls can we avoid in our search for a therapeutic for aging? Finally, we must also ask whether an elixir for aging would be applicable to everyone, or whether we age differently, thus potentially shortening lifespan in some individuals.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsSignal TransductionBiomarkersPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID26646496
OpenAlexW2190857292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.