Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26646429›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2015

Use of prescription stimulant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Aboriginal children and adolescents: a linked data cohort study.

Manonita Ghosh, C D'Arcy J Holman, David B Preen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The need for speed? Exploring the risks and benefits of pharmacological treatment for adult ADHD in prisons.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manonita GhoshCentre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. manonita.ghosh@uwa.edu.au.
C D'Arcy J HolmanCentre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. darcy.holman@uwa.edu.au.
David B PreenCentre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. david.preen@uwa.edu.au.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing recognition of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) among Aboriginal children, adolescents and young adults is a public health challenge. We investigated the pattern of prescription stimulants for ADHD among Aboriginal individuals in Western Australia (WA).

methodsUsing a whole-population-based linked data we followed a cohort of individuals born in WA from 1980-2005, and their parents were born in Australia, to identify stimulant prescription for ADHD derived from statutory WA stimulant prescription dispensing between 2003 and 2007. Parental link was ascertained through WA Family Connections Genealogical Linkage System. Cox proportional hazards regression (HR) models were performed to determine the association between stimulant use and Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal status.

resultsOf the total cohort of 186,468, around 2% (n = 3677) had prescription stimulants for ADHD. Individuals with both Aboriginal parents were two-thirds (HR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.26-0.42), and with only Aboriginal mother were one-third (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90) less likely to have stimulants, compared to individuals with non-Aboriginal parents. HR in Aboriginals was 62% lower (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.25-0.49) in metropolitan areas, and 72% lower (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.20-0.38) in non-metropolitan areas, than non-Aboriginals. The risk for simulant use was four times higher among Aboriginal boys than Aboriginal girls (HR 4.08, 95% CI, 2.92-5.69).

conclusionAboriginal cultural understanding of ADHD and attitude towards stimulant medication serve as a determinant of their access to health services. Any ADHD intervention and policy framework must take into account a holistic approach to Aboriginal culture, beliefs and individual experience to provide optimal care they need.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDextroamphetamineDrug TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMethylphenidatePrescription DrugsProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSex FactorsCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineMethylphenidatePrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26646429
PMCPMC4673717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.