ArticleJournal of anatomy2016
The better to eat you with: the comparative feeding morphology of phocid seals (Pinnipedia, Phocidae).
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Legacy of Exposure: Lactational PFAS Transfer and Early-Life Accumulation in Northern Elephant Seals.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Review
- Sensitivity to airborne sounds in ice-dependent bearded seals.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
- Individual Specialization in a Generalist Apex Predator: The Leopard Seal.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Complex Origins and History of the Relict Fennoscandian Ringed Seals.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- New species ofPeerJ · 2024Article
- Videofluoroscopy of the aerodigestive tract inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Cetacean tongue mobility and function: A comparative review.Journal of anatomy · 2023Review
- Feeding morphology and body size shape resource partitioning in an eared seal community.Biology letters · 2023Article
- Canine morphometrics as a tool for distinguishing species, sex, and age class in Southern Ocean fur seals.Journal of morphology · 2022Article
- Comparative examination of pinniped craniofacial musculature and its role in aquatic feeding.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
- Sexual dimorphism in the walrus mandible: comparative description and geometric morphometrics.PeerJ · 2022Article
- Morphological identification in skull between spotted seal and harbor seal using geometric morphometrics.Journal of morphology · 2021Article
- The isotopic niche of Atlantic, biting marine mammals and its relationship to skull morphology and body size.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A new large-bodied Pliocene seal with unusual cutting teeth.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Evolution and Diversification of Delphinid Skull Shapes.iScience · 2020Article
- The oldest record of the Steller sea lionPeerJ · 2020Article
- Shifts in cranial integration associated with ecological specialization in pinnipeds (Mammalia, Carnivora).Royal Society open science · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One adaptation crucial to the survival of mammalian lineages that secondarily transitioned from land to water environments was the ability to capture and consume prey underwater. Phocid seals have evolved diverse feeding strategies to feed in the marine environment, and the objectives of this study were to document the specialized feeding morphologies and identify feeding strategies used by extant phocids. This study used principal component analysis (PCA) to determine the major axes of diversification in the skull for all extant phocid taxa and the recently extinct Caribbean monk seal (n = 19). Prey data gathered from the literature and musculoskeletal data from dissections were included to provide a comprehensive description of each feeding strategy. Random Forest analysis was used to determine the morphological, ecological and phylogenetic variables that best described each feeding strategy. There is morphological evidence for four feeding strategies in phocids: filter; grip and tear; suction; and pierce feeding. These feeding strategies are supported by quantitative cranial and mandibular characters, dietary information, musculoskeletal data and, for some species, behavioral observations. Most phocid species are pierce feeders, using a combination of biting and suction to opportunistically catch prey. Grip and tear and filter feeding are specialized strategies with specific morphological adaptations. These unique adaptations have allowed leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) and crabeater seals (Lobodon carcinophaga) to exploit novel ecological niches and prey types. This study provides the first cranial and mandibular morphological evidence for the use of specialized suction feeding in hooded seals (Cystophora cristata), northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris) and southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). The most important variables in determining the feeding strategy of a given phocid species were cranial and mandibular shape, diet, and phylogeny. These results provide a framework for understanding the evolution and adaptability of feeding strategies employed by extant phocid species, and these findings can be applied to other pinniped lineages and extinct taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.