ArticleGenome biology2015
Five selfish reasons to work reproducibly.
Article in Genome biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive modelling of brain disorders with magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review of modelling practices, transparency, and interpretability in the use of convolutional neural networks.Human brain mapping · 2023Pooled it
- Metabonaut: an open educational resource for learning reproducible, script-based untargeted LC-MS/MS metabolomics.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Review
- TaxaScope: a container-native, visualization-centric workstation for genome-based bacterial taxonomy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- LC-MS Data Processing Using xcms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Advancing MRI, together: open science in MR research.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Eight quick tips for biologically and medically informed machine learning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Gene signatures for cancer research: A 25-year retrospective and future avenues.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Seven quick tips for gene-focused computational pangenomic analysis.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- Ten quick tips for electrocardiogram (ECG) signal processing.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Designing, conducting, and reporting reproducible animal experiments.The Journal of endocrinology · 2023Review
- Ten simple rules for implementing open and reproducible research practices after attending a training course.PLoS computational biology · 2023Review
- FAIR human neuroscientific data sharing to advance AI driven research and applications: Legal frameworks and missing metadata standards.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- The R Language: An Engine for Bioinformatics and Data Science.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Implementation and assessment of an end-to-end Open Science & Data Collaborations program.F1000Research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
And so, my fellow scientists: ask not what you can do for reproducibility; ask what reproducibility can do for you! Here, I present five reasons why working reproducibly pays off in the long run and is in the self-interest of every ambitious, career-oriented scientist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.