Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26646132›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2016

Ovarian Cancer Treatment and Survival Trends Among Women Older Than 65 Years of Age in the United States, 1995-2008.

Jenny J Lin, Natalia Egorova, Rebeca Franco, Monica Prasad-Hayes, Nina A Bickell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Death of 43 Indonesian women with ovarian cancer: A case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jenny J LinDivision of General Internal Medicine, the Department of Population Health Science and Policy, and the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Natalia Egorova
Rebeca Franco
Monica Prasad-Hayes
Nina A Bickell

Funding

Racial Disparities, Survival & Secondary Debulking for Ovarian CancerR01CA157176 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BICKELL, NINA A. · 2011 to 2013
$1.3M
Impact of Cancer on Adherence in DiabetesK07CA166462 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI LIN, JENNY J. · 2013 to 2017
$846k
NCI NIH HHS 1K07CA166462NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA157176NCI NIH HHS K07 CA166462NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether overall survival is improving among women in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated trends in treatment and overall survival for women older than 65 years diagnosed with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 1995 and 2008 using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Parametric and semiparametric multivariate survival analyses were used to assess comparative treatment survival rates and factors affecting survival and recurrence.

resultsOf 7,938 women who met study criteria, 2.9% received no treatment, 15.4% underwent surgery only, 24.8% received chemotherapy only, 41.8% underwent primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy in an optimal timeframe, and 15.1% had primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy, but the timing was not optimal or patients did not complete all six cycles of chemotherapy. Those who underwent surgery only had similar survival as those who received no treatment (2.2 compared with 1.7 months), whereas those who received chemotherapy only had a better overall survival (14.4 months). Optimal treatment was associated with the longest survival time (P<.001, median overall survival 39.0 months). Additionally, survival time associated with optimal treatment increased over the past decade. However, the proportion of women who received optimal treatment has decreased over the past decade.

conclusionElderly women with advanced ovarian cancer have the best survival with optimal therapy. When this is not offered or possible, chemotherapy alone offers better survival than surgery alone.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramSurvival RateUnited StatesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26646132
PMCPMC4689627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.