Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26645955›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2016

Location of childbirth for rural women: implications for maternal levels of care.

Katy B Kozhimannil, Michelle M Casey, Peiyin Hung, Shailendra Prasad, Ira S Moscovice

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Seasonality, Weather, and Obstetric Level of Care: An Analysis of Rural Delivery Locations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Bridging the Gap: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a New Rural Maternity Care Center Amid Nationwide Closures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rural-urban differences in substance use during pregnancy.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Perinatal outcomes for rural obstetric patients and neonates in rural-located and metropolitan-located hospitals.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katy B KozhimannilUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health. Electronic address: kbk@umn.edu.
Michelle M CaseyUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health.
Peiyin HungUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health.
Shailendra PrasadUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Minnesota.
Ira S MoscoviceUniversity of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Univ of Minnesota Buidling Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD055887 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ALLEN, SHARON S, BERGE, JERICA M · 2007 to 2023
$8.6M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recent American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) consensus statement on levels of maternity care lays out designations that correspond to specific capacities available in facilities that provide obstetric care. Pregnant women in rural and remote areas receive particular attention in discussions of regionalization and levels of care, owing to the challenges in assuring local access to high-acuity services when necessary. Currently, approximately half a million rural women give birth each year in US hospitals, and whether and which of these women give birth locally is crucial for successfully operationalizing maternal levels of care.

objectiveWe sought to characterize rural women who give birth in nonlocal hospitals and measure local hospital characteristics and maternal diagnoses present at childbirth that are associated with nonlocal childbirth. STUDY

designThis was a repeat cross-sectional analysis of administrative hospital discharge data for all births to rural women in 9 states in 2010 and 2012. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict the odds of childbirth in a nonlocal hospital (at least 30 road miles from the patient's residence). We examined patient age, race/ethnicity, payer, rurality, clinical diagnoses (diabetes, hypertension, hemorrhage during pregnancy, placental abnormalities, malpresentation, multiple gestation, preterm delivery, prior cesarean delivery, and a composite of diagnoses that may require MFM consultation), as well as local hospital characteristics (birth volume, neonatal care level, ownership, accreditation, and system affiliation).

resultsThe rate of nonlocal childbirth among 216,076 rural women was 25.4%. It varied significantly by primary payer (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.86 for Medicaid vs private insurance) and by clinical conditions including multiple gestation (AOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.58-2.1), preterm deliveries (AOR, 2.41; 95% CI, 2.17-2.67), and conditions that may require MFM services or consultation (AOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.22-1.35). Rural women whose local hospital did not have a neonatal intensive or intermediate care unit had nearly double the odds of giving birth at a nonlocal hospital (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.64-2.31).

conclusionApproximately 75% of rural women gave birth at local hospitals; rural women with preterm births and clinical complications, as well as those without local access to higher-acuity neonatal care, were more likely to give birth in nonlocal hospitals. However, after controlling for clinical complications, rural Medicaid beneficiaries were less likely to give birth at nonlocal hospitals, implying a potential access challenge for this population.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricRural PopulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, RuralHospitals, UrbanHumansIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaternal AgeMedicaidPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthUnited Stateshospital carematernal complicationspreterm birthrural obstetrics

Identifiers

PMID26645955
PMCPMC4851567
OpenAlexW2185834966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.