ArticleEuropean radiology2016
Diagnostic accuracy of low-mA chest CT reconstructed with Model Based Iterative Reconstruction in the detection of early pleuro-pulmonary complications following a lung transplantation.
Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low-dose chest CT vs chest X-ray for acute non-traumatic pulmonary diseases.European radiology · 2025Trial
- Breast dose reduction for chest CT by modifying the scanning parameters based on the pre-scan size-specific dose estimate (SSDE).European radiology · 2017Trial
- Ultra-low-dose CT vs. chest X-ray in non-traumatic emergency department patients - a prospective randomised crossover cohort trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Low-dose chest CT for diagnosing and assessing the extent of lung involvement of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia using a semi quantitative score.PloS one · 2020Article
- Assessment of chest CT at CTDIThe British journal of radiology · 2017Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Chest Computed Tomography Optimization: A Task-based Framework for Balancing Detectability and Radiation Dose.Journal of medical physicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the accuracy of reduced-dose, low-mA chest CT (RD-CT) reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in detecting usual early complications following pulmonary transplantation, as compared to standard-dose chest CT (SD-CT) reconstructed with adaptative statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).
methodsOur institutional review board approved this prospective study and patients provided written informed consent. Two thoracic radiologists independently evaluated 47 examinations performed routinely in 20 patients during 6 months following lung transplantation for the detection and/or evolution of usual pleuropulmonary complications and for subjective image quality. Each examination consisted of successive acquisition of unenhanced SD-CT (100-120 kV, noise index 45, ASIR) and RD-CT (100 kV, 16-24mAs/slice, MBIR).
resultsMean CTDIvol was 4.12 ± 0.88 and 0.65 ± 0.09 mGy for SD-CT and RD-CT, respectively. Complications were found in 40/47 (85 %) examinations. Sensitivity and negative predictive value of RD-CT were 92-100 % for the detection of pneumonia, fungal infection, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and bronchial dehiscence or stenosis, as compared to SD-CT. Image quality of RD-CT was graded good for 81 % of examinations.
conclusionsMBIR-RD-CT is accurate, as compared to SD-CT, for delineating most usual pleuropulmonary complications during the 6 months following pulmonary transplantation and might be used routinely for the early monitoring of pulmonary allografts. KEY POINTS: • Early chest complications are frequent following a pulmonary transplantation • CT has a key role for their detection and follow-up • Low-mAMBIR CT is accurate for monitoring most lung allograft early pleuropulmonary complications • MBIR chest CT allows a six-fold dose reduction compared to standard CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.