Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26645550›Full record

ArticlePain2016

Brain measures of nociception using near-infrared spectroscopy in patients undergoing routine screening colonoscopy.

Lino Becerra, Christopher M Aasted, David A Boas, Edward George, Meryem A Yücel, Barry D Kussman, Peter Kelsey, David Borsook

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain: Time for increased rigor.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Measuring "pain load" during general anesthesia.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Colonoscopy Procedures.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lino BecerraP.A.I.N. Group, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Center for Pain and the Brain, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Departments of Radiology Anesthesia and Critical Care, and Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher M Aasted
David A Boas
Edward George
Meryem A Yücel
Barry D Kussman
Peter Kelsey
David Borsook
Protein Express (United States) · US

Funding

Objective Pain Measures in Awake Sedated, Anesthetized Individuals with NIRSR01GM104986 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOAS, DAVID A, BORSOOK, DAVID · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104986NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM104986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy is an invaluable tool for the screening and diagnosis of many colonic diseases. For most colonoscopies, moderate sedation is used during the procedure. However, insufflation of the colon produces a nociceptive stimulus that is usually accompanied by facial grimacing/groaning while under sedation. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a nociceptive signal elicited by colonic insufflation could be measured from the brain. Seventeen otherwise healthy patients (age 54.8 ± 9.1; 6 female) undergoing routine colonoscopy (ie, no history of significant medical conditions) were monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Moderate sedation was produced using standard clinical protocols for midazolam and meperidine, titrated to effect. Near-infrared spectroscopy data captured during the procedure was analyzed offline to evaluate the brains' responses to nociceptive stimuli evoked by the insufflation events (defined by physician or observing patients' facial responses). Analysis of NIRS data revealed a specific, reproducible prefrontal cortex activity corresponding to times when patients grimaced. The pattern of the activation is similar to that previously observed during nociceptive stimuli in awake healthy individuals, suggesting that this approach may be used to evaluate brain activity evoked by nociceptive stimuli under sedation, when there is incomplete analgesia. Although some patients report recollection of procedural pain after the procedure, the effects of repeated nociceptive stimuli in surgical patients may contribute to postoperative changes including chronic pain. The results from this study indicate that NIRS may be a suitable technology for continuous nociceptive afferent monitoring in patients undergoing sedation and could have applications under sedation or anesthesia.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyPain ManagementSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidBrainFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMidazolamMiddle AgedNociceptionPainProcedural SedationAnalgesics, OpioidHypnotics and SedativesMidazolam

Identifiers

PMID26645550
PMCPMC4794375
OpenAlexW2322039374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.